The utility of physiotherapy assessments delivered by telehealth: A systematic review

Abstract

Background Telehealth use is increasing due to its ability to overcome service access barriers and provide continued care when disease transmission is of concern. However, little is known of the validity, reliability and utility of performing physiotherapy assessments using synchronous forms of telehealth across all physiotherapy practice areas. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the current clinometric value of performing physiotherapy assessments using synchronous forms of telehealth across all areas of physiotherapy practice. Methods A comprehensive search of databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Embase and EBSCO) was undertaken to identify studies investigating the clinometric value of performing physiotherapy assessments using synchronous forms of telehealth across all physiotherapy practice areas. Following selection, a quality appraisal was conducted using the Brink and Louw or Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Evidence regarding validity, reliability and utility of synchronous telehealth physiotherapy assessments was extracted and synthesised using a critical narrative approach. Results Thirty-nine studies conducted in a variety of simulated (n = 15) or real-world telehealth environments (n = 24), were included. The quality of the validity, reliability and utility studies varied. Assessments including range of movement, muscle strength, endurance, pain, special orthopaedic tests (shoulder/elbow), Berg Balance Scale, timed up and go, timed stance test, six-minute walk test, steps in 360-degree turn, Movement Assessment Battery for Children (2 nd Edition), step test, ABILHAND assessment, active straight leg raise, and circumferential measures of the upper limb were reported as valid/reliable in limited populations and settings (many with small sample sizes). Participants appeared to embrace telehealth technology use, with most studies reporting high levels of participant satisfaction. If given a choice, many reported a preference for in-person physiotherapy assessments. Some inconsistencies in visual/auditory quality and challenges with verbal/non-verbal communication methods were reported. Telehealth was considered relatively cost-effective once services were established. Conclusions Performing physiotherapy assessments using synchronous forms of telehealth appears valid and reliable for specific assessment types in limited populations. Further research is needed in all areas of physiotherapy practice, to strengthen the evidence surrounding its clinometric value. Clinicians contemplating using this assessment mode should consider the client/family preferences, assessment requirements, cultural needs, environment, cost considerations, access and confidence using technology. Protocol registration PROSPERO: CRD42018108166.

Os labirintos da gestão, práticas, modelos de protocolo e financiamento em saúde

“…Importante mencionar que outras ferramentas tecnológicas têm sido implementadas, como aplicativos e chatbots, buscando otimizar atendimento e reorganizar a oferta de serviços de fisioterapia (ANGARITA; DIANA; GIAIMO, 2017). Embora outros campos da saúde e outras aeaeaeaeaeaea áreas de conhecimento busquem e já estabeleçam aplicativos de smartphones e chatbots para atendimento de suas demandas, no campo da Fisioterapia, ainda é prevalente o teleatendimento, principalmente na modalidade de telerreabilitação (AGOSTINI et al, 2015;SERON et al, 2021;ZISCHKE et al, 2021) Importante mencionar o trabalho de (KOH et al, 2021), que delineia o uso da telerobótica no campo da Fisioterapia, antes mesmo de aperfeiçoamentos e popularização dos chatbots no atendimento e consultoria do fisioterapeuta.…”

Physical Therapist Impressions of Telehealth and Virtual Reality Needs Amidst a Pandemic

“…Other studies have shown that there is good agreement between telerehabilitation and face-to-face care for assessment of patients including lower back pain and hamstring flexibility (Palacín-Marín et al (2013);Moral-Muñoz et al (2015)) Additionally, telerehabilitation was shown to be effective following primary total hip or knee arthroplasty that did not compromise quality compared to face-to-face care and had high patient satisfaction (Kuether et al (2019)). When contemplating telerehabilitation physical therapists (PT) should consider patient preference, assessment requirements, culutural needs, environment, cost, access, and confidence using technology (Zischke et al (2021)). These studies show the results for online physical therapy have been effective with long term benefits to both the patient and the therapist.…”

Accessing hearing‐health services for deaf and hard‐of‐hearing children during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Parent and child perspectives

“…Telehealth has played an increasingly important role in the paediatric setting, with its applications extending beyond speech‐language pathology to physical therapy and psychology services (Havenga et al, 2015 ). Two studies conducted throughout the early stages of the pandemic that explored the role that telehealth services had in facilitating physiotherapy assessments and the provision of psychological services for children indicated that telehealth services played a vital role in facilitating access during the pandemic, especially when in‐person services were unavailable (Payne et al, 2020 ; Zischke et al, 2021 ). However, both studies referenced above left the impression that whilst telehealth services certainly provided access for children and their families, it was dangerous to assume that telehealth services were likely to overtake or replace in‐person services in the future.…”