“…In contrast to our results, the vast majority of commercial NAATs demonstrated high sensitivities in previous studies, but their high costs prevent their wide use 2,5,21 . At institutions where EIAs are still used for the diagnosis of CDI, some authors have suggested the submission of more than one sample from the same patient, but this practice remains controversial given that some studies have demonstrated that multiple samples do not signifi cantly increase the positive predictive value of the test and may even increase the rate of false positives 5,25,26 . Some authors have also suggested that an algorithm with at least two steps is required for the accurate diagnosis of CDI in humans, but there is still no consensus on which tests should be used in each step 5,16,22,27 .…”