2003
DOI: 10.1159/000070780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Utility of Systematic Reviews: The Case of Psychological Debriefing after Trauma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sensky [63, 64] illustrates the methodological integration required for the interpretation of meta-analysis results. Feinstein [56] had also warned against the authoritative aura given to collections of ‘best available evidence’, which may lead to major abuses that produce inappropriate guidelines or dogmas for clinical practice.…”
Section: Treatment Ingredients and Evidence-biased Psychiatrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensky [63, 64] illustrates the methodological integration required for the interpretation of meta-analysis results. Feinstein [56] had also warned against the authoritative aura given to collections of ‘best available evidence’, which may lead to major abuses that produce inappropriate guidelines or dogmas for clinical practice.…”
Section: Treatment Ingredients and Evidence-biased Psychiatrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of these [8, 9] were circumscribed in their aims, while the other two [6, 7] were more ambitious in their scope. Direct comparisons between these four reviews are complicated because they did not share precisely the same objectives, nor precisely the same selection criteria for the primary studies they included [10]. The comments below apply particularly to these latter two reviews.…”
Section: Limitations Of Current Meta-analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If such a subgroup exists, its features should be identified to allow PD to be used only for that subgroup. It is also possible that PD’s effect might vary according to features of the trauma and of the victim [16]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%