2001
DOI: 10.2190/fufr-pk9f-6u10-jxrk
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Utility of the Ces-D as a Depression Screening Measure among Low-Income Women Attending Primary Care Clinics

Abstract: Results indicated that the CES-D appears to be as valid for low-income, minority women as for any other demographic group examined in the literature. Despite similar validity, the CES-D appears to be inadequate for routine screening in this population. The positive predictive value remains very low no matter which cut-scores are used. The costs of the false positive rates could be prohibitive, especially in similar public primary care settings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
143
1
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
5
143
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the CES-D does not guarantee the presence of clinically significant depression. The positive predictive validity of a CES-D screen of C16 for major depressive disorder was relatively low (0.28) in at least one sample of low income women, meaning that two-thirds of women who screened positive did not meet criteria for major depressive disorder [30]. Similarly, though a woman's positive CES-D screen at three points suggests recurrence of symptoms, our use of the term ''always'' depressed is not strictly accurate, since there were long stretches between these visits when symptoms may have abated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Second, the CES-D does not guarantee the presence of clinically significant depression. The positive predictive validity of a CES-D screen of C16 for major depressive disorder was relatively low (0.28) in at least one sample of low income women, meaning that two-thirds of women who screened positive did not meet criteria for major depressive disorder [30]. Similarly, though a woman's positive CES-D screen at three points suggests recurrence of symptoms, our use of the term ''always'' depressed is not strictly accurate, since there were long stretches between these visits when symptoms may have abated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[28][29][30] We defined depressive symptoms as a CES-D score of Ն16. This cutoff point corresponds to 80th percentile scores for community samples and has a 95% sensitivity for diagnosing major depressive disorder (MDD) among low-income women, although the specificity and positive predictive value for MDD are low (70% and 0.28, respectively).…”
Section: Study Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Responses are summed for a total score ranging from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicative of more depressive symptoms. Evidence of reliability and validity has been established in lowincome women [35].…”
Section: Study Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%