2010
DOI: 10.1186/1471-244x-10-76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The utility of the Historical Clinical Risk -20 Scale as a predictor of outcomes in decisions to transfer patients from high to lower levels of security-A UK perspective

Abstract: BackgroundStructured Professional Judgment (SPJ) approaches to violence risk assessment are increasingly being adopted into clinical practice in international forensic settings. The aim of this study was to examine the predictive validity of the Historical Clinical Risk -20 (HCR-20) violence risk assessment scale for outcome following transfers from high to medium security in a United Kingdom setting.MethodsThe sample was predominately male and mentally ill and the majority of cases were detained under the cri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results also correspond to the findings by Dolan and Khawaja () that, among the three scales of the HCR‐20, the Historical scale best predicted recommitment and violent reoffending among forensic patients discharged from medium security settings over a two year follow‐up period. However, results differed from those reported by Dolan and Blattner (), who observed that scores on the Historical scale did not differentiate recommitted or reconvicted forensic patients from those who successfully transferred from a medium security facility. Patients in the latter study and current study presented similar numbers of risk factors, as the mean scores on the Historical scale were equivalent.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results also correspond to the findings by Dolan and Khawaja () that, among the three scales of the HCR‐20, the Historical scale best predicted recommitment and violent reoffending among forensic patients discharged from medium security settings over a two year follow‐up period. However, results differed from those reported by Dolan and Blattner (), who observed that scores on the Historical scale did not differentiate recommitted or reconvicted forensic patients from those who successfully transferred from a medium security facility. Patients in the latter study and current study presented similar numbers of risk factors, as the mean scores on the Historical scale were equivalent.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Dolan and Khawaja () reported that elevated scores on these scales are correlated with revocation of release among forensic psychiatric patients. Furthermore, Dolan and Blattner () reported that total scores and scores on the Clinical and Risk Management scales differentiated mentally ill offenders who were recommitted to a high security psychiatric facility following transfer to a medium security facility from those who were not recommitted. Patients were “at risk” of recommitment for an average of six years; however, whether the scales differed in their predictive validity over time was not reported.…”
Section: Use Of Risk Assessment Measures In Evaluations Of Readiness mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the HCR-20 is established as a predictor of moves and recalls [5-8], we hypothesised that any other measure would have to have a significant effect even when correcting for HCR-20 dynamic risk. We further hypothesised that the risk of violence or self-harm, combined with the seriousness of the risk, would be significant determinants of the decisions to move patients, based on the original formulation of Scott concerning risk and the seriousness of the risk [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study of forensic psychiatric patients released into the community found correlations between final risk judgements and future community violence (Douglas et al, 2003). Correlations between clinical and risk management factor subscales and institutional violence were found in a sample of prisoners (Belfrage, Fransson, & Strand, 2000) and a more recent study (Dolan & Blattner, 2010) found that HCR-20 scores were a robust predictor of failure following transfer from a high to a medium secure unit in the United Kingdom.…”
Section: The Hcr-20 and Principles Of Risk Assessment Toolsmentioning
confidence: 96%