2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11194-005-4602-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Utility of the Trans-Theoretical Model of Behavior Change in the Treatment of Sex Offenders

Abstract: This paper discusses the use of the Trans-theoretical Model of Behavior Change in the treatment of sex offenders. Constructs within this theory are the Stages of Change, Processes of Change and Decisional Balance. The first section of this paper provides a brief description of these constructs. The second section provides a brief review of research related to these constructs and discusses the implications of this research in relation to the treatment of sex offenders. The third section of this paper provides … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The metric for assessing treatment change and risk reduction on the VRS is presented in the "Method" section. The TM conceptualization of treatment change has been applied to other forensic populations including domestically violent offenders (Levesque, Gelles, & Velicer, 2000), young offenders (Hemphill & Howell, 2000;Willoughby & Perry, 2002), and sexual offenders (Olver et al, 2007;Tierney & McCabe, 2005). A description of the static and dynamic predictors and a more detailed description of the VRS are provided elsewhere (Wong & Gordon, 2006; also see Olver & Wong, in press, for a more detailed discussion of the modified application of the TM and responses to recent critique of the TM).…”
Section: Linking Assessment and Treatment: The Violence Risk Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The metric for assessing treatment change and risk reduction on the VRS is presented in the "Method" section. The TM conceptualization of treatment change has been applied to other forensic populations including domestically violent offenders (Levesque, Gelles, & Velicer, 2000), young offenders (Hemphill & Howell, 2000;Willoughby & Perry, 2002), and sexual offenders (Olver et al, 2007;Tierney & McCabe, 2005). A description of the static and dynamic predictors and a more detailed description of the VRS are provided elsewhere (Wong & Gordon, 2006; also see Olver & Wong, in press, for a more detailed discussion of the modified application of the TM and responses to recent critique of the TM).…”
Section: Linking Assessment and Treatment: The Violence Risk Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model, which is widely used in changing health‐related behaviors (Casey, Day & Howells, 2005), conceives the process of behavioral change as comprising five stages with identifiable goals that must be attained in order to instigate, consolidate, and maintain the desired change: pre‐contemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance. The transtheoretical model has been shown to be useful when incorporated into the treatment of a range of problem behaviors, including sex offending (e.g., Tierney & McCabe, 2005), addictions (DiClemente, 2003) and domestic violence (Begun, Shelley, Strodthoff & Short, 2001). The model was originally developed for addictive or habitual behaviors that usually have a high observable frequency that enables close monitoring of progress.…”
Section: Psychological Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars believe that teenagers' tness behavior is affected by such factors as the environment (such as weather), socialization (such as imitation), cognition (such as attitude), physiological state (such as physical tness), and individual (such as the economy). These factors have been developed into theories and strategies to explain and change tness behavior [11]. Among them, the transtheoretical model (TTM) believes that the tness exercise behavior is not all-or-nothing but a continuous change, and the lower tness exercise behavior is caused by the higher self-conscious barrier (cons) and lower self-e cacy in the early stage of thinking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%