2022
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1023562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The utility of ultrasound and computed tomography in the assessment of carotid artery plaque vulnerability–A mini review

Abstract: As the burden of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events continues to increase, emerging evidence supports the concept of plaque vulnerability as a strong marker of plaque rupture, and embolization. Qualitative assessment of the plaque can identify the degree of plaque instability. Ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) have emerged as safe and accurate techniques for the assessment of plaque vulnerability. Plaque features including but not limited to surface ulceration, large lipid core, thin fibrous cap (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several scores have been proposed. In the Gray Weale-Nicolaides (GWN) classification lipid-rich plaques appear echolucent, while those with fibrous and calcific content appear echogenic [ 74 , 75 ]. The Gray Scale Median (GSM) score constitutes the quantified measurement of plaque echogenicity and an important, objective, valid, marker of carotid plaque vulnerability [ 76 ] associated with increased cardiovascular mortality [ 77 ].…”
Section: Detection Of Arterial and Atherosclerotic Calcificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several scores have been proposed. In the Gray Weale-Nicolaides (GWN) classification lipid-rich plaques appear echolucent, while those with fibrous and calcific content appear echogenic [ 74 , 75 ]. The Gray Scale Median (GSM) score constitutes the quantified measurement of plaque echogenicity and an important, objective, valid, marker of carotid plaque vulnerability [ 76 ] associated with increased cardiovascular mortality [ 77 ].…”
Section: Detection Of Arterial and Atherosclerotic Calcificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of new pathological capillaries promotes macrophage infiltration, inflammation, and lipid deposition as well as intraplaque hemorrhages that contribute to a progressive increase in the instability of plaques [37]. A rupture is commonly found in the plaques where the fibrous cap thickness is less than 0.065 mm and the lipid core volume constitutes 40% of the total plaque volume [38]. Also, an intraplaque hemorrhage is considered to be a risk factor for plaque rupture [39,40].…”
Section: Vulnerable Plaquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It uses a grading system based on echogenicity that classifies atherosclerotic plaques into five types. Type 1 is uniformly echolucent and mostly composed of lipid and necrotic components; type 2 is predominantly echolucent, with small areas of echogenicity caused by calcifications of up to 25% of the plaque volume; type 3 is predominantly echogenic, with small areas of echolucency and calcifications that consist of up to 50% of the plaque volume; type 4 is uniformly echogenic due to calcification of over 50% of the volume; and type 5 consists of plaques that cannot be classified owing to heavy calcification and acoustic shadows [38]. Hypoechoic plaques (types 1 and 2) (Figure 1) are associated with intraplaque hemorrhages and lipid accumulation, whereas hyperechoic homogeneous plaques are predominantly fibrous or calcified in nature [64].…”
Section: Gray-weale-nicolaides Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, CT is considered to be the most effective imaging technique for identifying calcification in carotid plaques [ 133 ]. On CT, a soft plaque is generally defined as a low-attenuation plaque with approximately <60 HU, whereas fibrous tissue is considered to be between 60–130 HU and >130 HU is considered to be a calcified plaque [ 134 ]. However, there is significant overlap in HU values among LRNC, connective tissue, and IPH, and the presence of calcification artifact limits its usefulness in plaque analysis [ 131 , 135 ].…”
Section: Biomarkers Of Non-invasive Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%