The Utility of Urodynamic Studies in Neuro-Urological Patients

Abstract

Introduction: The utility of a clinical tool lies in its clinical performance evaluation and describes the relevance and usefulness of that tool in a medical setting. The utility of urodynamic and video-urodynamic studies in the management of specific urodynamic profiles in the diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic approach in neuro-urological patients is the focus of the current review. Methods: For this narrative review, a PubMed® search was performed by cross-referencing the keywords “urodynamics”, “neurogenic bladder”, “utility”, “clinical utility” and “clinical performance” with various terms related to the management of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. Clinical practice guidelines and landmark reviews from the most renowned experts in the field were also used. Analysis: Assessment of the utility of urodynamic study was performed during the diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic steps of the neuro-urological patients’ management. We focused on its clinical performance in the identification and evaluation of several unfavorable events, such as neurogenic detrusor overactivity, detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia, elevated detrusor leak point pressure and the presence of vesico-ureteral reflux, which may be indicators for a higher risk for the development of urological comorbidities. Conclusion: Despite the paucity of existing literature assessing the utility of urodynamic study—specifically video-urodynamic study—in neuro-urological patients, it does remain the gold standard to assess lower urinary tract function precisely in this patient category. With regard to its utility, it is associated with high clinical performance at every step of management. The feedback on possible unfavorable events allows for prognostic assessment and may lead us to question current recommendations.

Neuro-Urology and Biobanking: An Integrated Approach for Advancing Research and Improving Patient Care

“…This involves a thorough medical history, physical examination, and diagnostic testing to identify the underlying cause of urinary tract dysfunction. The evaluation may include urodynamic studies, which assess bladder function and the coordination between the bladder and the urethra during the filling and emptying phases [ 4 , 5 ]. Neuroimaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [ 6 ] or computed tomography (CT) [ 7 ], may also be utilized to visualize the structures or the control of the urinary tract and identify anatomical or neurological abnormalities.…”