2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4242-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Utrecht cohort for Multiple BREast cancer intervention studies and Long-term evaLuAtion (UMBRELLA): objectives, design, and baseline results

Abstract: PurposeIn oncology, RCTs are often beset by slow recruitment, limited generalizability, and strong preferences for interventions by patients and physicians. The cohort multiple randomized controlled trial (cmRCT) is an innovative design with the potential to overcome those challenges. In cmRCT, a prospective cohort serves as an infrastructure for multiple RCTs. We implemented cmRCT in a clinical breast cancer setting by creating UMBRELLA—a large prospective cohort of breast cancer and DCIS patients/survivors.M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current evidence for irradiating autologous abdominal flaps remains weak, involving only two moderate‐quality studies of the 12 included in this report. Future cohort studies should be designed and powered to take advantage of newly evolving study designs, such as multiple‐cohort RCTs or trials within cohorts. These designs permit collection of big data within registry or cohort platforms, and allow multiple synchronous randomized trials to be conducted in a cost‐effective manner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current evidence for irradiating autologous abdominal flaps remains weak, involving only two moderate‐quality studies of the 12 included in this report. Future cohort studies should be designed and powered to take advantage of newly evolving study designs, such as multiple‐cohort RCTs or trials within cohorts. These designs permit collection of big data within registry or cohort platforms, and allow multiple synchronous randomized trials to be conducted in a cost‐effective manner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the calculated number of subjects should be multiplied by (1-ρ 2 ), plus one extra subject per group [36], where ρ represents the correlation between baseline and follow-up outcomes. In our previous trials [34,35], we identified correlation of 0.4 between baseline and follow-up QoL. This leads to a final sample size of 83 patients per group (98*0.84 + 1).…”
Section: Statistical Analyses Sample Size Calculationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Here, we determine a clinically relevant difference as a difference of 10 points [30]. A difference of 10 points is realistic because in a previous exercise trial in patients with cancer, QoL in the intervention group improved by 15.1 points (SD 17.7) and in the control group by 6.1 points (SD 17.1) using the EORTC-QLQ-30 after the 12-week intervention [34,35]. Therefore, using the control group data from the previous trial and the 10-point difference, we assume a 6-point increase in QoL in the control group and a 16-point increase in the intervention group, among patients who accept the intervention in this cmRCT.…”
Section: Statistical Analyses Sample Size Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study was conducted within the prospective Utrecht cohort for Multiple BREast cancer intervention studies and Long-term evaLuAtion (UMBRELLA) [18]. UMBRELLA includes patients with invasive breast cancer and patients with DCIS, referred to the Department of Radiation Oncology of the University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht for adjuvant radiotherapy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%