1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70603-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The vaginal introitus: A novel site for Chlamydia trachomatis testing in women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
60
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
60
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As in previous studies on C. trachomatis/N. gonorrhoeae NAAT assays, our data show that a urine specimen alone is not sufficiently sensitive (86.7%) to screen for N. gonorrhoeae in females (19,20). We have previously shown that interference from mucopurulent discharge in N. gonorrhoeae-positive patients causes failed cobas 4800 results (12), and this has also been reported by Hopkins et al (10).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…As in previous studies on C. trachomatis/N. gonorrhoeae NAAT assays, our data show that a urine specimen alone is not sufficiently sensitive (86.7%) to screen for N. gonorrhoeae in females (19,20). We have previously shown that interference from mucopurulent discharge in N. gonorrhoeae-positive patients causes failed cobas 4800 results (12), and this has also been reported by Hopkins et al (10).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The slightly higher sensitivities found with vulvovaginal swabs support the findings of other studies. [165][166][167][168][169][170][171] In addition, the cost per positive test was about 30% lower for vulvovaginal swab than for first catch urine specimens, largely owing to the lower number of inhibitory swab specimens tested by BD SDA. The time take to process the two specimen types was very similar, but urine specimens are thought to be more difficult for inexperienced staff to process, 172 and betweencentre variation in estimated sensitivity might be greater for first catch urine specimens (range 50-100%) than for vulval swabs (range 70-100%, with only one centre less than 90%).…”
Section: Vulvovaginal Swabs As a Non-invasive Specimen In Womenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vaginal introitus (17) and vulva (12) have been shown to be acceptable sites for noninvasive sampling with swabs for the detection of C. trachomatis. It has been shown that patient-obtained vaginal swab specimens can be used to accurately detect N. gonorrhoeae infections (4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%