2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2019.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The validation of a newly developed Arabic scale to assess patient-reported side-effects of antineoplastic agents

Abstract: BackgroundMultiple scales in different languages were developed to measure patient-reported side effects of antineoplastics. However, these scales vary in their coverage of antineoplastics’ side effects, and none of them address both the severity and impact of antineoplastics’ side effects on patient quality of life. Hence, there is a need to develop a comprehensive, concise, and general scale to assess patients’ perceptions of both severity and impact of the commonly reported side effects of antineoplastics o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has good validity and reliability with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.91. It evaluates 40 distinctive chemotherapy side effects and consists of three subscales: frequency, severity, and how the side effects affect patients’ daily activities [ 17 ]. In this study, the reliability test for ASES resulted in Cronbach’s alpha of 0.737 for the ASES frequency subscale, 0.876 for the severity subscale, and 0.896 for the daily life effect subscale, whereas the reliability of the total scale was 0.933.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has good validity and reliability with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.91. It evaluates 40 distinctive chemotherapy side effects and consists of three subscales: frequency, severity, and how the side effects affect patients’ daily activities [ 17 ]. In this study, the reliability test for ASES resulted in Cronbach’s alpha of 0.737 for the ASES frequency subscale, 0.876 for the severity subscale, and 0.896 for the daily life effect subscale, whereas the reliability of the total scale was 0.933.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%