The Validation of Geriatric Cases for Interprofessional Education: A Consensus Method

Abstract

Background: Case-based Interprofessional Education (IPE) can help students practise their roles and responsibilities. To construct these cases, input from experts in clinical practice is essential. Consensus between these experts can be facilitated using consensus methods. In this study, a geriatric focus for the cases was chosen because of the interprofessional nature of geriatrics and the ageing population in healthcare facilities. Methods: By combining the 3 most commonly used consensus methods, we developed a 6-step approach to validate cases for IPE. The 6 steps include 3 expert rounds (Steps 1, 3 and 5) and 2 rounds in which discussion points were formulated by the researcher (Steps 2 and 4). The cases were piloted with students as Step 6. Four facets of a case were included: the patient description, the complemented treatment plan, the difficulty of the case and the scoring of the treatment plan. Our educational setting required constructing 4 cases with increasing difficulty. Results: Step 1: 5 typical geriatric cases were assembled. Step 2: Similar characteristics were defined; 5 cases were merged into 4. The 4 cases showed increasing difficulty levels. Step 3: The constructed cases were validated for patient description authenticity, treatment plan adequacy, difficulty and scoring of the treatment plan. Step 4: The items for further discussion were defined. Step 5: Consensus was reached for all 4 cases through a face-to-face discussion. Step 6: The student pilot for Case 1 showed no significant adjustments. Conclusion: We developed a 6-step consensus method to validate cases for IPE, and we constructed 4 geriatric cases based on this method. While consensus about the patient descriptions and difficulty levels was reached easily, consensus on the treatment plans was more difficult to achieve. Validation of the scoring of the treatment plan was unsuccessful. Further research on this will be conducted.

Interprofessional collaboration skills and motivation one year after an interprofessional educational intervention for undergraduate medical and nursing students

“…At the Northwest Clinics in Alkmaar, the Netherlands, students were asked to draw up health care plans for paper-based geriatric patient cases, four times over a one-year period. The four cases, with an increasing level of difficulty during the year and typical geriatric care problems, were constructed through discussion with different geriatric experts [ 19 ].…”

How does interprofessional education influence students’ perceptions of collaboration in the clinical setting? A qualitative study

“…During each session, randomly paired couples of one medical student and one nursing student were asked to write a health care plan for a fictitious patient case that was discussed. The patient cases were constructed with the involvement of different experts, including clinical specialists, nurses, general practitioners, ensuring everyone’s perspective was well represented [ 21 ]. While discussing the patient’s problems and possible diagnostics or interventions, students learn with, from and about each other.…”

Iteratively refined ChatGPT outperforms clinical mentors in generating high-quality interprofessional education clinical scenarios: a comparative study

“…Creating IPE clinical scenarios that meet educational standards remains a challenging task. Inspired by the concept of agentic work ows in ChatGPT (12,13), we recognize that generating IPE cases requires the involvement of multiple experts playing different roles, providing diverse perspectives, and engaging in discussions and iterative modi cations (14). This mirrors the iterative re nement and role-playing strategies employed by ChatGPT (15,16).…”