2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The validation of Short Interspersed Nuclear Elements (SINEs) as a RT-qPCR normalization strategy in a rodent model for temporal lobe epilepsy

Abstract: BackgroundIn gene expression studies via RT-qPCR many conclusions are inferred by using reference genes. However, it is generally known that also reference genes could be differentially expressed between various tissue types, experimental conditions and animal models. An increasing amount of studies have been performed to validate the stability of reference genes. In this study, two rodent-specific Short Interspersed Nuclear Elements (SINEs), which are located throughout the transcriptome, were validated and a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
7
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to three different algorithms designed to calculate relative expression stability -geNorm, NormFinder and BestKeeper -all of the 10 RGs obtained stability scores well inside recommended cut-off values, in essence predicting all of the RGs to be suitable for RT-qPCR normalization. This is in contrast to previous studies testing across different rat tissues (Svingen et al, 2015) or brain tissue from rats (Cook et al, 2009;Yang et al, 2008;Zhou et al, 2016), mice (Crans et al, 2019) or humans (Rydbirk et al, 2016). Notably, brain tissue from a rat sleep apnea model displayed high stability of all tested RGs except 18S rRNA (Julian et al, 2014), a stability also seen in rat brains across fetal developmental stages (Al-Bader & Al-Sarraf, 2005), which agrees with our findings of relative high stability among RGs in this tissue (Julian et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…According to three different algorithms designed to calculate relative expression stability -geNorm, NormFinder and BestKeeper -all of the 10 RGs obtained stability scores well inside recommended cut-off values, in essence predicting all of the RGs to be suitable for RT-qPCR normalization. This is in contrast to previous studies testing across different rat tissues (Svingen et al, 2015) or brain tissue from rats (Cook et al, 2009;Yang et al, 2008;Zhou et al, 2016), mice (Crans et al, 2019) or humans (Rydbirk et al, 2016). Notably, brain tissue from a rat sleep apnea model displayed high stability of all tested RGs except 18S rRNA (Julian et al, 2014), a stability also seen in rat brains across fetal developmental stages (Al-Bader & Al-Sarraf, 2005), which agrees with our findings of relative high stability among RGs in this tissue (Julian et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The most stably expressed genes across the brain regions tested in our study were Ppia and Pgk1. The hippocampal mRNA expressions of Ppia and Pgk1 were also reported to be stable in the asphyxial cardiac arrest model and the latent phase of the kainate epilepsy model [7,15]. Ppia expression was stable in the dentate gyrus in the febrile seizure model [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We could not find in PubMed any previous study analyzing gene stability in the brain using the PTZ model. Only a few works investigated the stability of housekeeping gene expression using other animal models of seizure or epilepsy: after neonatal (P10) febrile seizures [2]; after short (30 min) and long (8 h) perforant pathway stimulation [15]; after systemic/intrahippocampal pilocarpine injection [32]; and in the kainic acid model of temporal lobe epilepsy [7,15]. These works analyzed the entire hippocampus [15,32] or dental gyrus of the hippocampus [2]; an exception was the study by Crans et al (2019) [7], where expression stability was analyzed in the hippocampal tissue and in the neocortex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations