Policy Issues in Employment Testing 1994
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-2202-3_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Validity and Fairness of Alternatives to Cognitive Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
76
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 187 publications
6
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this meta-analysis we constructed artifact distributions for unreliability in the measurement of each of the MSLQ subscales and for unreliability in the measurement of the academic performance criterion. Given that very few studies in the educational literature have ever reported reliability information for GPA and none (to our knowledge) have reported reliability information for individual grades, we imported the four published reliability estimates known to us for GPA (Barritt, 1966;Bendig, 1953;Reilly & Warech, 1993;Stricker, Rock, Burton, Muraki, & Jirele, 1994), while estimates of grade reliability were taken from five large undergraduate classes recently taught by the first author. Summary information for the various reliability distributions is provided in Table 2.…”
Section: Analytic Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this meta-analysis we constructed artifact distributions for unreliability in the measurement of each of the MSLQ subscales and for unreliability in the measurement of the academic performance criterion. Given that very few studies in the educational literature have ever reported reliability information for GPA and none (to our knowledge) have reported reliability information for individual grades, we imported the four published reliability estimates known to us for GPA (Barritt, 1966;Bendig, 1953;Reilly & Warech, 1993;Stricker, Rock, Burton, Muraki, & Jirele, 1994), while estimates of grade reliability were taken from five large undergraduate classes recently taught by the first author. Summary information for the various reliability distributions is provided in Table 2.…”
Section: Analytic Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artifact distribution information for unreliability in both the adjustment variables and GPA criterion are presented Mean R 1/2 XX the mean of square root of reliabilities, k rel number of reliabilities in the distribution, SDr rel standard deviation of reliability distribution in Table 1, with all five adjustment types exhibiting highly satisfactory distributions for their respective estimates of internal consistency (mean alpha>0.82). The reliability distribution for the GPA criterion was based on internal consistency reliabilities from four studies of college grades from Stricker et al (1994) Reilly and Warech (1993), Barritt (1966), Bendig (1953). For meta-analyses involving college retention as the criterion we did not correct for unreliability.…”
Section: Meta-analytic Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were based on internal consistency estimates of grade reliability. [37][38][39] Since NAB-PLEX licensing examination scores resulted in important real-world outcomes that are based on an imperfectly reliable measure, no corrections were made for the unreliability in the NABPLEX.…”
Section: Data Coding and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%