2016
DOI: 10.1177/1758573216655079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The validity and reliability of ultrasound on identifying supraspinatus tears during passive external rotation from 0° to 30°: a pilot project

Abstract: Background: Controversy exists regarding how much external rotation should be allowed following rotator cuff repair. Clinicians may use ultrasound imaging (USI) to visualize the supraspinatus (SSp) tendon during passive external rotation. However, the validity and reliability of USI used to assess supraspinatus tendon gap formation during external rotation needs to be established prior to using this technique in patient cohorts. Methods: Ten subjects with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmation of full-t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
(35 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in agreement with the meta‐analysis of Roy et al, Lenza et al, Smith et al and Chen et al, who found good agreement between US and MRI in evaluating biceps tenosynovitis with sensitivity (94.4%), SASD bursitis with sensitivity (86.1%), and posterior recess synovitis with sensitivity (86.1%). Our results were different from Kennedy et al who showed lower sensitivity of US for detection of supraspinatus pathology; this may be explained by their low sample size as they examined only 10 patients and by the fact that US examination is operator‐dependent and results can vary according to the quality of the machine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These results are in agreement with the meta‐analysis of Roy et al, Lenza et al, Smith et al and Chen et al, who found good agreement between US and MRI in evaluating biceps tenosynovitis with sensitivity (94.4%), SASD bursitis with sensitivity (86.1%), and posterior recess synovitis with sensitivity (86.1%). Our results were different from Kennedy et al who showed lower sensitivity of US for detection of supraspinatus pathology; this may be explained by their low sample size as they examined only 10 patients and by the fact that US examination is operator‐dependent and results can vary according to the quality of the machine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%