2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00382.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Validity of Cloninger's Psychobiological Model Versus the Five‐Factor Model to Predict DSM‐IV Personality Disorders in a Heterogeneous Psychiatric Sample: Domain Facet and Residualized Facet Descriptions

Abstract: The validity of Cloninger's psychobiological model and the Five-Factor Model of personality to predict DSM-IV personality disorders was examined in a psychiatric in-patient sample of 130 individuals. Patients completed Dutch authorized versions of the TCI (Cloninger, Svrakic, & Przybeck, 1993) and the NEO PI-R (Costa & McCrae, 1992) and were also administered the ADP-IV (Schotte & De Doncker, 1994), a Dutch self-report questionnaire to assess Axis-II disorders. No personality-descriptive model proved to be sup… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
1
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
42
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the relatively strong correlations between traits from both models might be due to the small sample used here. The cooperativeness-agreeableness correlation (r = 0.77), for example, is actually higher than the one found by others (r = 0.51 in De Fruyt et al 2006). Whatever the case, our findings detailed next are consistent with earlier suggestions: personality traits assessed by these two models are related, but they measure different aspects of personality.…”
Section: Overview Of the Narrative-datasetssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the relatively strong correlations between traits from both models might be due to the small sample used here. The cooperativeness-agreeableness correlation (r = 0.77), for example, is actually higher than the one found by others (r = 0.51 in De Fruyt et al 2006). Whatever the case, our findings detailed next are consistent with earlier suggestions: personality traits assessed by these two models are related, but they measure different aspects of personality.…”
Section: Overview Of the Narrative-datasetssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Nevertheless, agreeableness was not associated to the narratives, thus, suggesting that cooperativeness might catch communal themes in the narratives better that agreeableness does. Both cooperativeness and agreeableness have earlier, as well as in the present study, been found to be positively related (De Fruyt et al 2006;Garcia 2011) to Reward Dependence or the tendency of being sentimental, warm, attached, and dependent (Cloninger et al 1993). In contrast to cooperativeness, however, agreeableness was here positively related to Harm Avoidance or the tendency of being worrying, pessimistic, fearful, and shy (Cloninger et al 1993).…”
Section: Correlation Analysis Between Psychometric and Sematic Measurescontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…First, meta-analyses of FFM and personality disorder relationships have demonstrated only partial overlap with different personality disorders (Samuel & Widiger, 2008;Saulsman & Page, 2004). For example, in an inpatient sample, De Fruyt, De Clercq, van de Wiele, and Van Heeringen (2006) found that the explained variance by the NEO-PI-R ranged from 45% for avoidant personality disorder to only 22% for narcissistic personality disorder. In a study with 668 patients recruited for the Collaborative Longitudinal Study of Personality Disorders, Morey and colleagues (2002) found that the borderline, avoidant, obsessive-compulsive, and schizotypal personality disorders shared a configuration of high neuroticism, low agreeableness, and low conscientiousness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particularly useful approach that has sometimes been adopted (e.g., Fruyt et al, 2006) is to examine semi-partial correlations between facets and criterion. This first assumes that an overall understanding of factor-level prediction has been obtained by examining relationship between factors and the criterion using the zero-order correlations or standardized coefficients from a regression model with just factors.…”
Section: Identifying the Importance Of Specific Personality Facetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a principled selection of estimators is lacking (e.g., see critical review by O'Connor & Paunonen, 2007). Furthermore, the use of small sample sizes (e.g., Ashton et al, 1995;Mershon & Gorsuch, 1988;Schimmack et al, 2004) and incomplete facet-factor comparisons, based on the selection of subsets of either facets or factors (e.g., Ashton et al, 1995;Bagby et al, 2005;Dudley, Orvis, Lebiecki, & Cortina, 2006;Fruyt, Clercq, Wiele, & Heeringen, 2006;Hastings & O'Neill, 2009;Paunonen & Ashton, 2001;Salgado et al, 2013;Stephan, 2009), has limited the available empirical evidence regarding the overall incremental value of facets over factors. Also, existing research has not explicitly specified a population parameter of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%