2000
DOI: 10.1086/301395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Validity of Mass Functions for the Central Stars of Planetary Nebulae

Abstract: It is commonly assumed that the distribution of masses for the central stars of planetary nebulae is strongly peaked about Such a mass function is similar to that deduced for white dwarfs. M CS + 0.6 M _ . We show in the following, however, that certain of the procedures used to evaluate are seriously N(M CS ) Ñawed and assume a nebular mass that is probably inappropriate. At the very least, the uncer-M NEB tainty in casts doubts upon the utility of these procedures, while the deduced functions M NEB N(M CS ) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is unlikely to be the case during optically thick phases of expansion, and may not even be true during later optically thin expansion (see e.g. the evolutionary modelling cited in , and the discussion of Phillips 2000a).…”
Section: The Evolutionary Characteristics Of Pne Central Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is unlikely to be the case during optically thick phases of expansion, and may not even be true during later optically thin expansion (see e.g. the evolutionary modelling cited in , and the discussion of Phillips 2000a).…”
Section: The Evolutionary Characteristics Of Pne Central Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much here depends upon whether their value of M ENV is plausible, however. Pottasch (1996) and Phillips (2000) suggest that values of M ENV may be greater, for instance, and this would push the phase of optical thinness to much later stages of evolution. Even where shells are optically thick to He ii ionizing radiation, the Zanstra temperature may underestimate central star effective temperatures where T EFF > 100 kK (Gruenwald & Viegas 2000). This disparity may be of order 13 per cent where T EFF = 150 kK, increasing to ∼25 per cent where T EFF = 400 kK. Observations of optical extinction (Phillips 1998) and near and far infrared emission (Pottasch 1984; Phillips & Cuesta 1994) testify to the importance of dust within the shells of PNe.…”
Section: The Relation Between Tz and Teffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much here depends upon whether their value of M ENV is plausible, however. Pottasch (1996) and Phillips (2000) suggest that values of M ENV may be greater, for instance, and this would push the phase of optical thinness to much later stages of evolution.…”
Section: The Relation Between Tz and Teffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is some alternative and largely independent evidence to support this presumption. Thus Phillips (2000a) has noted that ratios of Zanstra temperatures T z (HeII)/T z (HI) imply quite large optical depths in sources having radii R < 2 pc. Not all such sources are optically thick, but it is clear that many of them are.…”
Section: Implications Of the Deduced Radial Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%