1979
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(79)90148-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The validity of temporomandibular joint radiographs using the head positioner

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
4

Year Published

1980
1980
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the relationship between the condyle and articular fossa, some investigators reported posterior displacement of the mandibular position. [11][12][13] Hence, assessing the GS patterns is extremely interesting, and a significant evaluation regarding the relevance of occlusion/articulation and TMDs may be possible by using this method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the relationship between the condyle and articular fossa, some investigators reported posterior displacement of the mandibular position. [11][12][13] Hence, assessing the GS patterns is extremely interesting, and a significant evaluation regarding the relevance of occlusion/articulation and TMDs may be possible by using this method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, posterior displacement of the mandible, determined on the basis of the relationship between the condyle and articular fossa, is dangerous and leads to TMJ dysfunction. [11][12][13] It is usually difficult to measure the loading and displacement of the condyle caused by the occlusal force associated with a parafunction such as bruxism. The quality of occlusion may be assessed by analyzing the pattern of condylar behaviors in relation to the articular fossa during lateral-border movement in the absence of tooth contact and in cases of bruxism in which there is strong contact between the upper and lower teeth; this is the first report regarding condylar dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining the previous research results, it can be estimated that approximately 35-45% of the population will develop Class II malocclusion in the permanent dentition. Much research has shown that the retrognathic mandible rather than the prognathic maxilla is the defining feature of Class II malocclusion [11,16] and this group of malocclusions often leads to craniomandibular disorders [12,25]. Class II malocclusion presents a substantial risk to oral health, and we therefore urge dental professionals to recognize the condition in the earliest stage possible in order to implement early therapeutic interventions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vários trabalhos identificaram a falta de concentricidade do côndilo em relação à fossa articular como característica própria de indivíduos sintomáticos. A posição mais posterior do côndilo foi considerada fator predisponente a desarranjos articulares (ARTUN;TRUELOVE, 1992;MIKHAIL;ROSEN, 1979;PULLINGER et al,1986;WEINBERG, 1983). Porém, Pullinger et al (1985) verificaram que não se poderia indicar tratamento da posição condilar nãoconcêntrica por esta apresentar-se também em população assintomática.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified