2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.02.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The validity of the Montgomery–Aasberg depression rating scale as a screening tool for depression in later life

Abstract: The MADRS has good discriminating power to detect depression in elderly persons and should be preferred to the CSDD for use with persons without dementia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 264 publications
(400 reference statements)
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each of the scale’s 10 items can be rated from 0 to 6, which generates a total score ranging from 0 to 60; a higher score denotes more severe depression. The scale has been validated in the Norwegian language for use with older patients [32, 33]. Up to 2 missing items were replaced by 0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each of the scale’s 10 items can be rated from 0 to 6, which generates a total score ranging from 0 to 60; a higher score denotes more severe depression. The scale has been validated in the Norwegian language for use with older patients [32, 33]. Up to 2 missing items were replaced by 0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also a checkpoint for “not possible to evaluate.” The range on the scale is from 0 to 38, and a higher score denotes more severe depression [34]. The Norwegian version has been validated and its reliability tested among patients with and without dementia in hospitals and nursing homes [33, 35, 36]. Up to 4 missing items were replaced by 0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scale has ten items; each can be rated from 0 to 6, resulting in a total range from 0 to 60. A higher score denotes more severe depression (Montgomery & Aasberg, 1979; see also Engedal et al, 2012). To assess anxiety, we applied the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI).…”
Section: Assessment Of the Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several Depression Scales that have been evaluated for several age groups, e.g. the MADRS that has been shown to be valid screening instrument also for depression in elderly patients [102].…”
Section: Co-factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%