The Validity of the Smart Management Strategy for Health Assessment Tool-Life (SAT-Life) in General Population

Yun, Young Ho; Sim, Jin Ah

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-28834/v1

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…SAT-Life is based on the previously validated SAT-SF questionnaire for use among cancer patients to evaluate their self-management health strategies, 15 21 and then modified to assess the general population's coping strategies to help them overcome life crises and improve their QOL and well-being. Therefore, we also aimed to validate the assessment tool with reliability and comparison with other validated assessment tools in this study with the general population.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Association of the Health Management Strategy with Subjective Health and Well-being Outcomes in General Population

Yun

Sim

2021

J Korean Med Sci

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background People face many obstacles to overcoming crisis in life and proactively manage life crises. This study aimed to evaluate the association of self-management strategy with subjective health and well-being for the general South Korean population. Methods We recruited 1,200 respondents using an equal-probability sampling method from March to May 2018. A questionnaire including life version of the Smart Management Strategy for Health Assessment Tool (SAT-Life), the five Health Status Questionnaire, Short Form-12, McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire (MQOL), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) was administered to participants. Results In multiple stepwise logistic regression model adjusted with basic demographic variables (age, sex, region, education and monthly income level), core strategy was independently associated with physical, mental, social, spiritual, and general health status (adjusted odds ratios [aORs], 1.97–2.92). Preparation strategy was independently associated with physical, mental, spiritual, and general health status (aORs, 2.36–3.31). Implementation strategy was independently associated with physical, social, spiritual, and general health status (aORs, 2.22–2.42). Core strategy and implementation strategy were independently associated with higher Physical Component Score (aORs, 2.21–2.29) and higher Mental Component Score (aORs, 1.68–1.76). Core strategy and preparation strategy were independently associated with lower PHQ-9 (aORs, 2.63–3.74). Pearson's correlation coefficients between scores on SAT-Life and the other factors (MQOL social support, MQOL spiritual well-being, and SWLS) explain having significant correlations ranging from 0.41–0.43. Conclusion Self-management strategies of health might be encouraged to manage subjective health and well-being outcomes.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Association of the Health Management Strategy with Subjective Health and Well-being Outcomes in General Population

Yun

Sim

2021

J Korean Med Sci

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Intelligent health management strategies, adaptation, and validation of the SAT-SF questionnaire into Spanish in cancer patients

Cerron Tito,

Delgado Baca,

Espinola-Sánchez

et al. 2024

Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction A sudden cancer diagnosis creates a psycho-emotional and social crisis, making it crucial to manage emotional coping strategies and assess comprehensive health care, addressing both behavioral and practical aspects of patients’ daily lives. Although there are instruments that measure strategies for emotional coping, emotional adjustment or post-traumatic growth, we still do not have a questionnaire in Spanish that comprehensively evaluates health self-management. Aim This study aims to translate into Spanish and determine the validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the Smart Management Strategy for Health Assessment Tool (SAT-SF) evaluation questionnaire in Peruvian patients with cancer. Methodology Cross-sectional study. Translation and back-translation of the SAT-SF were carried out. Next, 271 Peruvian adult patients of both sexes diagnosed with different types of cancer participated in the validation process. The factor structure was studied through Confirmatory Factor Analysis, the scale’s reliability through Cronbach’s alpha and omega coefficients, and the factorial invariance of the scale according to sex. For concurrent validity, the association with the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) social support scale was analyzed. Result The original model of three related dimensions presents acceptable fit indices to the data ( χ 2 = 1202.23; df = 402; p < .001; RMSEA = .086 [90% CI .080–.091]; SRMR = .065; CFI = .940; TLI = .930). The scale’s factor structure has shown evidence of being strictly invariant for the groups of men and women. The reliability indices according to dimensions were Personal competencies ( α = .91; ω = .92), Preparation strategies ( α = .87; ω = .86) and Implementation strategies ( α = .89; ω = .91). Additionally, it was evidenced that the dimensions of the SAT-SF are significantly related to the dimensions of the Social Support scale. Conclusion The SAT-SF questionnaire was adapted to Spanish, demonstrating adequate construct validity, internal consistency, reliability, and concurrent validity.

show abstract

The Validity of the Smart Management Strategy for Health Assessment Tool-Life (SAT-Life) in General Population

Cited by 2 publications

References 10 publications

The Association of the Health Management Strategy with Subjective Health and Well-being Outcomes in General Population

The Association of the Health Management Strategy with Subjective Health and Well-being Outcomes in General Population

Intelligent health management strategies, adaptation, and validation of the SAT-SF questionnaire into Spanish in cancer patients

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About