Objective: One of the problems in the application of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PB-PK) models is that authors often use di erent input parameters, with unknown in¯uence on the results. Di erences in the simulation results obtained with various sets of parameters are examined herein. Method: Chemicals considered were perchloroethylene, toluene, and styrene. Simulations of alveolar concentrations, blood concentrations, and urinary metabolite excretions were performed for the three solvents. The input parameters discussed herein are physiological values, metabolic constants, and partition coe cients. The inuence of metabolic constants and partition coe cients is studied by comparison of models against one another. Results: Metabolic parameters such as V max and K m varied considerably between authors. Tissue-gas partition coe cients, especially for the fat compartment, also di ered according to the authors. Such di erences in input parameter values proved to have a large in¯uence on PB-PK model results and, therefore, increased their uncertainties. Uncertainties were much more signi®cant in urinary metabolite concentration than in alveolar and blood concentration for chemicals that are poorly metabolized. On the other hand, uncertainties were more signi®cant in alveolar and blood concentrations than in urinary metabolite excretions for chemicals that are well metabolized. Conclusion: Careful attention is necessary in the selection and/or citation of values from published data. The validity of PB-PK models should be simultaneously con®rmed with both the blood and/or alveolar concentration and urinary metabolite concentrations.