2020
DOI: 10.1080/07315724.2020.1750073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Validity of Urine Color as a Hydration Biomarker within the General Adult Population and Athletes: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Laboratory data for urine (USG, urine color, osmolality) are considered good markers to evaluate HS [ 51 , 52 ]. In the present study, urine was measured via color chart in an afternoon urine spot, since USG findings of Bottin et al [ 26 ] suggest that an afternoon sample may be an accurate and practical tool for hydration monitoring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laboratory data for urine (USG, urine color, osmolality) are considered good markers to evaluate HS [ 51 , 52 ]. In the present study, urine was measured via color chart in an afternoon urine spot, since USG findings of Bottin et al [ 26 ] suggest that an afternoon sample may be an accurate and practical tool for hydration monitoring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a systematic review done by Kostelnik et al (2021), various studies evaluated UC to urine osmolality and urine specific gravity and demonstrated a lower correlation in older adults aged over 60 years. This indicates that UC is unable to express fluid intake or loss in older critically ill patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several mechanisms for MV effect. It has been found that 15 cm H2O positive pressure induced by MV depresses cardiac output, renal blood flow, and urine volume by 20 to 30 % so that UC is altered (Aitken L, Marshall A, 2019;Kostelnik et al, 2021).These combinations of changes among critically ill patients may alter the normal relationship between UC and hydration status.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…52 This is true not only for assessments of cognition but also for hydration status assessment. Objective measures of hydration status include urine and serum osmolality, urine specific gravity, urine volume, and body mass loss, 75 and no consensus exists on which hydration assessment method is the gold standard in research or practice. 16,76 Although few obvious patterns were observed across different measurement types here, there may be value in considering standardized measures of dehydration, as well as considering whether subjective, self-reported measures of dehydration status may in fact be used to improve our understanding of the actual cognitive effects of hydration status.…”
Section: Strengths Limitations and Future Research Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%