The Value O F Nonmarket Household Production: Opportunity Cost Versus Market Cost Estimates

Abstract

This paper discusses the problem of valuing the time spent on household production and presents estimates of that production for the United States in 1960 and 1970. The estimates are derived by using both opportunity cost and market cost valuations of household time. A comparative analysis of these estimates concludes first that opportunity cost estimates exceeded market cost estimates by 1.0 to 3.0 percent of the GNP. Second, the ratio of household production to the GNP, although declining slightly between 1960 and 1970, may in the long run tend to be relatively stable. These conclusions do not support the popular views that over time household production will decline in relative magnitude, or that the opportunity cost method of valuing household time, relative to the market cost method, is significantly upward biased.

Malaria in Rural Nigeria: Implications for the Millennium Development Goals

“…Second, the method does not usually discriminate between value of market and non‐market activities. Brody (1975), Murphy (1978) and Gauger and Walker (1980) indicate that the latter could be addressed through either of the market value or opportunity‐cost approach. In the market value approach, the services provided by the housekeeper are valued according to the estimated cost of replacing these services with labour, while the opportunity‐cost approach suggests that the value of a housekeeper's services is the wage the housekeeper could earn if working.…”

Cost-of-illness analysis

“…It assumes the economic value of unpaid work to be at least as much as the wage rate that the same person would command in the market place. Basically, if a woman chooses housework over employment, the housework must be equal to or greater than the value of the employment [28,29]. However, it was argued that this approach was inconsistent with that used to value the employed population where what one does is valued rather than what one could be doing [9].…”

A methodological and operative framework for the evaluation of an e‐health project

“…As far as the time spent to pick up a report is regarded, the estimate of the utility loss is based on the opportunity cost method (Gronau, 1973;Murphy, 1978). Consequently, we consider as opportunity cost the average hourly salary of a worker.…”