2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3605-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Value of Abdominal Drainage After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Mild or Moderate Acute Calculous Cholecystitis: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract: The use of abdominal drainage depends on the surgeon's personal preferences but is often used in high-risk populations. However, abdominal drainage does not appear to be of any benefit (in terms of postoperative outcomes) and may even compromise recovery in patients having undergone early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for mild or moderate ACC.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The median length of stay was significantly longer patients treated by postoperative antibiotics (6 days [1-50]) compared to patients not treated by postoperative antibiotics (4 days [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]), (p < 0.001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The median length of stay was significantly longer patients treated by postoperative antibiotics (6 days [1-50]) compared to patients not treated by postoperative antibiotics (4 days [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]), (p < 0.001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very few published studies have evaluated the enhanced recovery strategy for emergency surgery. 12,13 As it has been shown that the management of ACC does not require postoperative drainage, 14 postoperative antibiotic prescription should be based on guidelines and should be avoided whenever possible in order to simplify patient management. The use of standardised pathways developed by the operative team could help to reduce variation in practice by individual clinicians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A flow diagram for study inclusion and exclusion is presented in Figure 1. The initial searches generated 585 citations, of which four studies [10][11][12]17 considered to be suitable for the final meta-analysis using the stated eligibility criteria. A total of 796 patients (424 drained vs 372 no-drain patients in emergency LC).…”
Section: Search Results and Reporting Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from a meta-analysis of 13 RCTs had a high evidence level because of the homogenous population and the inclusion of more than 500 cases (217)(218)(219)(220)(221)(222)(223)(224)(225)(226)(227)(228)(229) . There is no disadvantage for patients without drain placement because the mortality rate was not different with or without a drain.…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%