2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10660-018-9322-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of backers’ word-of-mouth in crowdfunding projects filtering: an empirical investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The third cluster (blue) of the network is made of 47 keywords on the research stream of crowdfunding and P2P lending. The influential keywords which have maximum occurrences are community, fund raising, donation, nonprofit, and sustainability (Giudici et al 2018;Jo and Yang 2021;Konhäusner et al 2021;Wehnert et al 2019;Zheng et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third cluster (blue) of the network is made of 47 keywords on the research stream of crowdfunding and P2P lending. The influential keywords which have maximum occurrences are community, fund raising, donation, nonprofit, and sustainability (Giudici et al 2018;Jo and Yang 2021;Konhäusner et al 2021;Wehnert et al 2019;Zheng et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature on the topic suggests that crowdfunding platforms, especially those based on a reward-based model, provide a good alternative for financing innovative ideas and products that might have been difficult to develop with traditional financing channels [45][46][47]. In contrast with traditional financing instruments, crowdfunding financers can be pushed, for instance, by the willingness to support an environmental cause instead of the mere financial outcome, then bear higher risks for supporting an innovative project [20].…”
Section: Reward-based Crowdfunding For Supporting the Development Of Environmentally Sustainable Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of stakeholder groups and the analysis of their mutual connections, considering aspects such as information flow and created value [20,21,24,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34]; 3.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%