Thromboembolism 1975
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-6144-2_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of clinical signs in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The risk and expense of venography are greatly outweighed by the risk and expense of unnecessary anticoagulation. (6) Deep vein thrombosis should not be diagnosed or excluded without objective confirmation either by venography or by a combination of methods that detect proximal and calf thrombosis -for instance, ultrasound plus 125I-fibrinogen uptake. (Accepted 23 December 1982) Is the anthelmintic levamisole of any value in the treatment of recurrent aphthous ulceration of the mouth ?…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk and expense of venography are greatly outweighed by the risk and expense of unnecessary anticoagulation. (6) Deep vein thrombosis should not be diagnosed or excluded without objective confirmation either by venography or by a combination of methods that detect proximal and calf thrombosis -for instance, ultrasound plus 125I-fibrinogen uptake. (Accepted 23 December 1982) Is the anthelmintic levamisole of any value in the treatment of recurrent aphthous ulceration of the mouth ?…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…46 In contrast, in patients with normal venograms, 81% had pain in the legs, 66% had ankle edema, and 52% had palpable differences in temperature; these finding were only slightly more common in those with DVT. 47 In contrast, it has been estimated that 50 to 85% of patients with DVT present without symptoms; in the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED) study only 15% of patients had clinical evidence of DVT. Similarly, in high-risk groups following hip or knee surgery, clinical evidence of DVT has been absent in a majority of patients with positive venograms.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15 The development of the noninvasive accurate techniques of impedance plethysmography and real time B-mode compression ultrasonography coupled with the well-documented lack of specificity and sensitivity of clinical findings has changed clinical practice so that the norm for the diagnosis of DVT is one of these studies. [16][17][18][19] In contrast to the relatively recent development of diagnostic tools, heparin was used in treating DVT in 1938 20 and pulmonary embolism in 1946 21 ; its extraordinary effectiveness was reported in a controlled trial in 1960. 22 The efficacy of oral anticoagulants was reported in the early 1940s 23,24 and a controlled trial for prophylaxis in trauma patients in 1959.…”
Section: The Past*mentioning
confidence: 99%