2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2012.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of CMV IgG avidity and immunoblot for timing the onset of primary CMV infection in pregnancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this finding is consistent with published data (2,24), it raises questions about the utility of algorithms requiring CMV IgM reactivity as a criterion for CMV IgG avidity testing (12,13,24). This issue is addressed in a companion publication (26) in which we assess the potential impact of 4 different CMV IgM assays on a reflexive algorithm in which only IgM-positive samples are tested for IgG avidity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although this finding is consistent with published data (2,24), it raises questions about the utility of algorithms requiring CMV IgM reactivity as a criterion for CMV IgG avidity testing (12,13,24). This issue is addressed in a companion publication (26) in which we assess the potential impact of 4 different CMV IgM assays on a reflexive algorithm in which only IgM-positive samples are tested for IgG avidity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This finding indicates that unacceptably low EIA sensitivity does not explain the unexpectedly large number of CMV IgG-negative specimens submitted for CMV IgG avidity testing. Rather, it suggests that these sera were not tested for CMV IgG before submission, an approach that is inconsistent with recommended algorithms for diagnosing and managing primary CMV infection during pregnancy (12,13,22,23). Programs are thus needed to educate physicians and laboratory personnel on the need to demonstrate CMV IgG positivity before submitting samples to an esoteric reference laboratory for CMV IgG avidity testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The measurement of CMV IgG avidity has emerged as one of the most useful laboratory assays for identifying primary CMV infection; this assay also enables an estimation of the length of time that has elapsed since the infection occurred (5,6). IgG avidity, defined as the aggregate strength of IgG binding to multiple antigenic epitopes of a given protein, gradually increases with time, reaching "high" levels by 5 to 6 months after the primary infection (1,4,(7)(8)(9). Thus, a finding of low CMV IgG avidity in a pregnant patient, particularly during the second or third trimester, suggests that CMV infection may have occurred after conception, which carries an increased risk of fetal infection (2,7,10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enable accurate and efficient identification of primary CMV infection in pregnant women, several investigators have recommended a testing algorithm that combines the good sensitivity of CMV IgM detection with the good sensitivity and specificity of CMV IgG avidity testing (5,8,9,12,13). Per this reflexive algorithm, serum from a patient found to be positive for CMV IgG is first tested for CMV IgM, and only those sera found to be IgM reactive are tested in a CMV IgG avidity assay.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%