2021
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.689618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Value of Different Single or Combined Indexes of the Captopril Challenge Test in the Diagnosis of Primary Aldosteronism

Abstract: ObjectiveThe result interpretation of the captopril challenge test (CCT) for the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) is not standardized. Superiorities of different indexes in the CCT have not been fully investigated. We aimed to comprehensively evaluate the value and influence factors of different CCT-associated indexes in the diagnosis of PA.MethodsWe enrolled 312, 85, 179 and 97 patients in the groups of PA, essential hypertension (EH), unilateral PA (UPA) and bilateral PA (BPA), respectively. For each … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cutoff value in this study was below the one that the guidelines proposed, which might be attributed to higher salt intake according to the 24-h urine sodium test. For CCT, the oral dose of captopril, the difference in position, individual drug metabolisms when collecting the serum, and even the reference diagnostic criteria were inconsistent, leading to non-unified results (33,34). In this study, the cutoff value was 10.7 ng/dL for post-CCT PAC and 26.9% for the suppression of post-CCT PAC, which was close to the guideline recommendation (10).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The cutoff value in this study was below the one that the guidelines proposed, which might be attributed to higher salt intake according to the 24-h urine sodium test. For CCT, the oral dose of captopril, the difference in position, individual drug metabolisms when collecting the serum, and even the reference diagnostic criteria were inconsistent, leading to non-unified results (33,34). In this study, the cutoff value was 10.7 ng/dL for post-CCT PAC and 26.9% for the suppression of post-CCT PAC, which was close to the guideline recommendation (10).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…A high AUC indicates a strong ability to distinguish between positive and negative samples. 18 Accuracy is a metric that measures the proportion of correctly classified samples to total samples, and indicates the overall correctness of the predictions of the classifier. 19 Precision is a metric that quantifies the proportion of true positive predictions to the total number of samples predicted as positive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%