1986
DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250070207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of formal planning for strategic decisions: Reply

Abstract: In Armstrong (1982a), I examined alternative explanations to the empirical findings that supported the use of formal planning. In considering the possibility that researcher bias might lead to such results, I used Terpstra's (1981) evaluation scheme. Based on this test, poor methodology did not seem responsible for the conclusions on the value of formal planning.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has long been recognized that strategy, whether a formally planned or emergent activity, is important in the success or failure of firms (Armstrong, 1982). Therefore, managers seeking to enhance performance are well advised to blend strategic planning activities to fit the needs of their particular organizations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has long been recognized that strategy, whether a formally planned or emergent activity, is important in the success or failure of firms (Armstrong, 1982). Therefore, managers seeking to enhance performance are well advised to blend strategic planning activities to fit the needs of their particular organizations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the past three decades numerous studies have been conducted examining the relationship of formal strategic planning with firm financial performance, and there have been at least ten published literature reviews addressing the topic [4,7,9,19,24,34,39,40,42,47]. Early studies comparing formal with informal planners resulted in conflicting evidence as to the performance benefits of planning.…”
Section: Formal Strategic Planning and Firm Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The framework suggested by this study is a strategic planning tool in the sense that it deals with and provides answers to three key questions of culinary tourism planning at destination level, as suggested by strategic planning literature (see, for instance, Armstrong, 1986;Bryson, 1988;Mintzberg, 1981). Generally, strategic planning deals with three key questions: (i) What do we do?…”
Section: Culinary Tourism: Suggesting a Strategic Planning Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars argue that formal strategy-making processes offer management a robust tool to navigate effectively in an increasingly turbulent and competitive business environment (Timmons et al, 1987;Robinson and Pearce, 1988;Armstrong, 1982). Other scholars question the usefulness of formal strategic planning, particularly in uncertain environments (Mintzberg et al, 1998;Hamel, 1996), and challenge the assumption that firms can effectively map out the future by largely drawing on the past in a formalized manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%