2010
DOI: 10.1136/bcr.08.2010.3229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of hysteroscopy in the diagnostic approach to a rudimentary horn pregnancy

Abstract: A 33-year-old woman presented with an ectopic pregnancy without any complaints. Laparoscopy was performed since a tubal pregnancy was expected. However, both fallopian tubes appeared normal and it was not possible to differentiate accurately between a pregnancy in a noncommunicating horn and a pregnancy in a bicornuate uterus. We therefore performed MRI which showed a thin myometrium around the pregnancy. In order to differentiate between a communicating and a non-communicating uterine horn the authors perform… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, other authors have attempted, through short series of cases, to develop specific USS criteria to facilitate preoperative diagnosis [8]. A recent literature review showed that only 5 % of the reported RHPs were diagnosed pre-operatively [9], whereas our search of laparoscopically managed RHP revealed that 9/20 (45 %) were confidently diagnosed pre-operatively. Jihong et al reported that their case was misdiagnosed by USS as missed miscarriage at 5, 7 and 8 weeks of gestational age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Subsequently, other authors have attempted, through short series of cases, to develop specific USS criteria to facilitate preoperative diagnosis [8]. A recent literature review showed that only 5 % of the reported RHPs were diagnosed pre-operatively [9], whereas our search of laparoscopically managed RHP revealed that 9/20 (45 %) were confidently diagnosed pre-operatively. Jihong et al reported that their case was misdiagnosed by USS as missed miscarriage at 5, 7 and 8 weeks of gestational age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A case of a 16-week ruptured RHP was initially thought to be an intra-uterine pregnancy developing in a bicornuate uterus at laparoscopy performed at 7 weeks for abdominal pain [11]. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can help differentiate between a RHP and a pregnancy in a bicornuate uterus which can be potentially viable [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of invasive hydatidiform moles in rudimentary horns is extremely rare. Due to the atypical characteristics of the condition, it is difficult to definitively diagnose it prior to surgery ( 18 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The continuity between the endometrium lining the gestational sac and the other uterine horn is typical for a pregnancy in a bicornuate uterus. In case of persistent doubt, hysteroscopy can easily determine the absence of a cervical channel to the uterine horn and consequently discriminate a rudimentary horn from a bicornuate uterus [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%