2016
DOI: 10.1504/ijbex.2016.078705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of intangibles and diversity on boards looking towards economic future returns: evidence from non-financial Iberian business organisations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the analysis of several studies addressing the issue of disclosure determinants, we have created a map of twenty studies (in Appendix 2) which allows the selection of factors influencing mandatory intangible assets disclosure: firm size, type of auditor, indebtedness, profitability, type of industry and foreign activity. These factors have been previously identified in a wide range of studies carried out by financial analysts and academics from around the world (Boubaker, Lakhal & Nekhili, 2012;Cooke,1989a;Cooke, 1992;Debreceny & Rahman, 2005;De Silva, Stratford & Clark, 2014;García-meca et al, 2005;Goebel, 2015;Lopes & Ferraz, 2016;Lopes & Rodrigues, 2007;Morariu, 2012;Oliveira et al, 2006;Ousama et al, 2012;Raffournier, 1995;Razak, Mohammad & Tobiagi, 2016;Tsalavoutas, 2011;Wallace et al, 1994;Whiting & Woodcock, 2011;Williams, 2001).…”
Section: Determinants Of Intangible Assets Disclosurementioning
confidence: 95%
“…From the analysis of several studies addressing the issue of disclosure determinants, we have created a map of twenty studies (in Appendix 2) which allows the selection of factors influencing mandatory intangible assets disclosure: firm size, type of auditor, indebtedness, profitability, type of industry and foreign activity. These factors have been previously identified in a wide range of studies carried out by financial analysts and academics from around the world (Boubaker, Lakhal & Nekhili, 2012;Cooke,1989a;Cooke, 1992;Debreceny & Rahman, 2005;De Silva, Stratford & Clark, 2014;García-meca et al, 2005;Goebel, 2015;Lopes & Ferraz, 2016;Lopes & Rodrigues, 2007;Morariu, 2012;Oliveira et al, 2006;Ousama et al, 2012;Raffournier, 1995;Razak, Mohammad & Tobiagi, 2016;Tsalavoutas, 2011;Wallace et al, 1994;Whiting & Woodcock, 2011;Williams, 2001).…”
Section: Determinants Of Intangible Assets Disclosurementioning
confidence: 95%
“…In addition, international portfolio investments incentivise good corporate governance practices worldwide (Aggarwal et al 2011), with institutional investors playing a role in monitoring management (Almazan et al 2008), although action to apply efficacious practices may depend on board characteristics (Bozec 2005;Dahya et al 2009). Diversity on boards is defined by a number of characteristics (Lopes and Ferraz 2016); the requirement to disclose non-financial information (European Parliament and the Council 2014; OECD 2015) includes reporting on board diversity and policy. In the current research, analyses of facets of the board include gender diversity, size, proportion of non-nationals, background of its members, and interlocking directors.…”
Section: 1governance and Diversity On Boardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, while other research has used several accounting-based measures in order to analyse the same impact (i.e. Profit Margin, Asset Turnover, Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), Earnings Per Share (EPS), Price Earnings Ratio (P-E), Pay-out Ratio, among others(Zahra and Pearce 1989;Shleifer and Vishny 1997;Von Nandelstadh and Rosenberg 2003;Bhagat and Black 2008;Guest 2009;Sachdeva 2014; Mizutani and Nakamura 2012;Rodriguez-Fernandez et al 2013;Klettner et al 2014;Mishra and Mohanty 2014;Mouselli et al 2014;Bianco et al 2015;Lopes and Ferraz, 2016), the current research selects only three of them (Profit Margin, Return on Equity, and Asset…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bhagat and Black (2008) advocate that boards can improve performance by increasing sensitivity to risk and embedding risk-aversion into organisational processes (Yaacob and Basiuni 2014). Effective CG deals not only with assuring ROI for investors (Shleifer and Vishny 1997;Lopes and Ferraz 2016), but also creates a system that directs and controls companies (Sheikh et al 2013).…”
Section: Introduction and Research Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%