2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2014.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of integrating Scan-to-BIM and Scan-vs-BIM techniques for construction monitoring using laser scanning and BIM: The case of cylindrical MEP components

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
168
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 421 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
168
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…1 The laser scanner which has been used in this experiment was the Riegl VZ-400, provided by Apeks company, placed in Gdansk, Poland. According to the producer brochure about the equipment, Riegl VZ-400 is able to collect the data with 3 mm precision and 5 mm accuracy [5]. The one more problem to investigate in post-processing the data is the level of noise, which has to be filtered before the data processing.…”
Section: Mission Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 The laser scanner which has been used in this experiment was the Riegl VZ-400, provided by Apeks company, placed in Gdansk, Poland. According to the producer brochure about the equipment, Riegl VZ-400 is able to collect the data with 3 mm precision and 5 mm accuracy [5]. The one more problem to investigate in post-processing the data is the level of noise, which has to be filtered before the data processing.…”
Section: Mission Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Main differences between them are accuracy of the provided data and land they could covered in one measurement mission. For single construction, the best is to use the most accurateterrestrial laser scanning [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For verification, the authors use the percentage of simulated points that can be verified by the real laser scan. In [6], [7], [8] this system is extended for progress tracking using schedule information, for estimating the progress in terms of earned value and for detecting secondary objects. In [9] specific component types are detected using a supervised classification method based on Lalonde features derived from the as-built point cloud.…”
Section: Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These 3D imaging sensors capture existing structural and terrestrial conditions accurately, objectively, and with greater continuity than any manual metrology methods. Despite these benefits, the potential of 3D imaging for applications like automated progress tracking [1] and automated dimensional compliance control [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] remains limited because isolating the object of interest from the collected data remains a manual process. Manually extracting information from the raw 3D images and running analysis is painstaking, requires many man-hours and specialized personnel training, and therefore discourages adoption by industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%