2004
DOI: 10.1108/13527590410556827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of intercultural competence for performance of multicultural teams

Abstract: If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
66
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
66
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, such teams are more likely to face difficulties such as miscommunication, low performance, lack of transparency, ineffective team development, lack of cultural awareness, and poor management of conflict (Adler, 1991;Shenkar and Zeira, 1992;Iles, 1995;Proehl, 1996;Matveev and Milter, 2004). Such conflicts may be task related or relationship related (Chuang et al 2004).…”
Section: Management Of Culturally Diversified Project Teamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such teams are more likely to face difficulties such as miscommunication, low performance, lack of transparency, ineffective team development, lack of cultural awareness, and poor management of conflict (Adler, 1991;Shenkar and Zeira, 1992;Iles, 1995;Proehl, 1996;Matveev and Milter, 2004). Such conflicts may be task related or relationship related (Chuang et al 2004).…”
Section: Management Of Culturally Diversified Project Teamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al., 2005;Shaftel, Shaftel & Ahluwalia, 2007) where cultural exposure, knowledge, information and experiences build sufficient affective responses among Malaysian students when encounter cultural differences abroad. The results also show that Malaysian students have certain magnitude of intercultural competency (Matveev & Milter, 2004) that facilitates their cross-cultural adjustment internationally. This finding sustain studies by William (2005), and Chen andStarosta (1996, 2000) where intercultural sensitivity determine the ability of a person to identify the similarity and differences of cultural context and contact.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Furthermore, having adequate cultural knowledge and skills stimulates intercultural competency (Matveev & Milter, 2004). For example, mianzi (face-saving) and guanxi (relationship) are key concepts in Chinese culture to ensure the effectiveness of business connection in China (see Buckley, Clegg & Tan, 2006;Chen, 2006;Friedman, Dyke & Murphy, 2009).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of studies on the intercultural awareness (example, Friedman, Dyke & Murphy, 2009;Ingulsrud, Kai, Kadowaki, Kurobane & Shiobara, 2006;Krainovich-Miller, Yost, Norman, Auerhahn, Dobal, Rosedale, Lowry & Moffa, 2008;Matveev & Milter, 2004;Rew, Becker, Cookston, Khosropour & Martinez, 2003) were qualitative in nature which identified dimensions and factors to intercultural awareness. Abilities to be aware of the cultural differences lead the transformation from ethnocentrism into ethnoreativism status (Bennett, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%