2022
DOI: 10.22498/pages.30.1.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of long-term history of small and fragmented old-growth forests for restoration ecology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to paleo-ecological data, during the middle ages, the land around the Biogradska forest was used for cereal crop cultivation and cattle herding, and later local, higher severity catchment fires occurred (Cagliero et al, 2022). This evidence supports the notion that historical land-use pressure reduced the extent of old-growth forests, and some sporadic anthropogenic disturbances could have affected all the European forest stands (Finsinger et al, 2022). On the other hand, our reference areas have developed naturally and have experienced only small-scale disturbances typical of old-growth and late seral stages of this forest type at least for the last three to four centuries (Nagel and Svoboda, 2008;Bottero et al, 2011;Motta et al, 2011).…”
Section: Study Areasmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…According to paleo-ecological data, during the middle ages, the land around the Biogradska forest was used for cereal crop cultivation and cattle herding, and later local, higher severity catchment fires occurred (Cagliero et al, 2022). This evidence supports the notion that historical land-use pressure reduced the extent of old-growth forests, and some sporadic anthropogenic disturbances could have affected all the European forest stands (Finsinger et al, 2022). On the other hand, our reference areas have developed naturally and have experienced only small-scale disturbances typical of old-growth and late seral stages of this forest type at least for the last three to four centuries (Nagel and Svoboda, 2008;Bottero et al, 2011;Motta et al, 2011).…”
Section: Study Areasmentioning
confidence: 60%