2021
DOI: 10.1111/opec.12199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of OPEC’s spare capacity to the oil market and global economy

Abstract: We investigate the extent to which OPEC has succeeded in its self‐stated mission of stabilising the oil market and the implications for the world’s economy. We discuss the modelling framework developed by Pierru, Smith and Zamrik (2018) and Pierru, Smith and Almutairi (2020) and update their analyses. Unstabilised monthly oil prices that would have prevailed in the absence of OPEC’s spare capacity policy are determined for the September 2001–June 2020 period. Overall, OPEC’s management of spare capacity has si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 To our knowledge only two papers focus explicitly on the period after 2016, the founding year of the OPEC+ alliance. Applying the model framework developed in Pierru et al (2018), Pierru et al (2020) and Almutairi et al (2021) show that OPEC’s management of its spare capacity after 2016 has led to a significant reduction in the volatility of oil prices. Whereas our research question differ from these two papers, their finding confirms that active interventions in the oil market by members of the OPEC+ alliance affected oil prices in recent years.…”
Section: Relationship With the Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 To our knowledge only two papers focus explicitly on the period after 2016, the founding year of the OPEC+ alliance. Applying the model framework developed in Pierru et al (2018), Pierru et al (2020) and Almutairi et al (2021) show that OPEC’s management of its spare capacity after 2016 has led to a significant reduction in the volatility of oil prices. Whereas our research question differ from these two papers, their finding confirms that active interventions in the oil market by members of the OPEC+ alliance affected oil prices in recent years.…”
Section: Relationship With the Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pierru, Smith, and Zamrik (2018) introduced a simpler version of the model we use here that indicated the extent to which OPEC successfully deployed spare capacity to offset perceived shocks to global oil demand and supply during the period 2001-2014. Pierru, Smith, and Almutairi (2020) and Almutairi, Pierru, and Smith (2021) applied that model-still using parameter estimates based on the 2001-2014 data-to confirm OPEC's retreat from stabilization during the so-called Market Share Campaign. They also estimated the value of OPEC's spare capacity buffer by calculating the expected increment to global GDP generated by OPEC's attempt to stabilize the oil price.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 10a) is a generalized version of Eq. ( 4) in Almutairi et al (2021) that accounts for the support provided by OPEC's Allies. In its right-hand-side, the difference between the log terms can take any sign, which shows that the counterfactual scenario rules out not only upward production adjustments but also downward adjustments that would counter positive supply shocks or negative demand shocks.…”
Section: Counterfactual 1 (Only Allies Pitch In)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, few studies have attempted to quantify the impacts of spare capacity on price behaviour and welfare. Almutairi et al ., (2021) find that during 2001–2014, OPEC's management of spare capacity decreased price volatility by at least 25 per cent relative to what it otherwise would have been, and the impact could have been even higher depending on the assumptions made about the price elasticity of short‐run oil demand and non‐OPEC supply. The authors also find that a sudden and unexpected loss of 1.5 million barrels per day (mb/d) from global supply over a 6‐month period would generate cumulative GDP losses of $166 billion over the next 5 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%