Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Background: The purpose of the study was to compare the safety of local injection of 6 units of pituitrin diluted to 20 mL vs 6 units of pituitrin diluted to 10 mL for laparoscopic uterine fibroid (UF) surgery. Methods: This was a randomized clinical trial of patients scheduled for laparoscopic UF surgery at Fu Xing Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. Ninety-six patients were divided into two groups according to the concentration of pituitrin utilized: Group1 (6 units of pituitrin diluted to 20 mL for all injection) 48 cases; Group2 (6 units of pituitrin diluted to 10 mL for all injection) 48 cases. The observation indicators were mean arterial pressure (MAP1) and heart rate (HR1) upon entering the operating room; the lowest mean arterial pressure (MAP2) and the highest heart rate (HR2) within 5 minutes after injecting pituitrin; the highest mean arterial pressure (MAP3) and the lowest heart rate (HR3) within 30 minutes after injecting pituitrin; hemoglobin (Hb1) and hematocrit (Hct1) within one week before surgery; hemoglobin (Hb2) and hematocrit (Hct2) within one day after surgery; and the time for the mean arterial pressure to return to the level of entering the operation room after using pituitrin (Recovery Time). Results: All baseline and observation data showed no statistical difference between the two groups. Conclusions: The safety profile of local injection of pituitrin in the 6 units of pituitrin diluted to 20 mL and 6 units of pituitrin diluted to 10 mL are the same when used for laparoscopic UF surgery.
Background: The purpose of the study was to compare the safety of local injection of 6 units of pituitrin diluted to 20 mL vs 6 units of pituitrin diluted to 10 mL for laparoscopic uterine fibroid (UF) surgery. Methods: This was a randomized clinical trial of patients scheduled for laparoscopic UF surgery at Fu Xing Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. Ninety-six patients were divided into two groups according to the concentration of pituitrin utilized: Group1 (6 units of pituitrin diluted to 20 mL for all injection) 48 cases; Group2 (6 units of pituitrin diluted to 10 mL for all injection) 48 cases. The observation indicators were mean arterial pressure (MAP1) and heart rate (HR1) upon entering the operating room; the lowest mean arterial pressure (MAP2) and the highest heart rate (HR2) within 5 minutes after injecting pituitrin; the highest mean arterial pressure (MAP3) and the lowest heart rate (HR3) within 30 minutes after injecting pituitrin; hemoglobin (Hb1) and hematocrit (Hct1) within one week before surgery; hemoglobin (Hb2) and hematocrit (Hct2) within one day after surgery; and the time for the mean arterial pressure to return to the level of entering the operation room after using pituitrin (Recovery Time). Results: All baseline and observation data showed no statistical difference between the two groups. Conclusions: The safety profile of local injection of pituitrin in the 6 units of pituitrin diluted to 20 mL and 6 units of pituitrin diluted to 10 mL are the same when used for laparoscopic UF surgery.
Background: The aim of this study was to determine whether dexmedetomidine can reduce the circulatory response in laparoscopic uterine fibroids (UF) surgery. Our purpose was to investigate the effect of dexmedetomidine on the circulatory response in laparoscopic UF surgery. Methods: This was a randomized controlled study of 214 patients age range of 40–60 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1–2 grade, undergoing elective laparoscopic UF surgery at Fuxing Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 2020 to October 2023. Patients were randomly allocated to the non-dexmedetomidine group (Group1) and dexmedetomidine group (Group2). The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were measured: when entering the operation room (MAP1, HR1), immediately at the time of local pituitrin injection (MAP2, HR2), and at 5 minutes after injection of pituitrin (MAP3, HR3). The medications and dosages (propofol, urapidil hydrochloride, fluid) used during the operation were recorded as well as the recovery (drowsiness, chills, nausea, vomiting, dysphoria) after the operation. Total mean time from the beginning of the operation to pituitrin injection (Time1) and recovery time after peaking blood pressure with pituitrin injection (Time2) were also recorded. Results: There were no significant differences in age, height, weight, size and number of UFs, and the location of uterine fibroids between the two groups. There were no differences between the groups for MAP1, MAP2, HR1, HR2, HR3, and Time1 (all p > 0.05), but the dexmedetomidine group was smaller in MAP3 (p = 0.041) and Time2 (p = 0.000) than the non-dexmedetomidine group. There were significant differences in MAP3-MAP1 (p = 0.025), propofol (p = 0.011), and urapidil hydrochloride (p = 0.000) between the two groups. The dexmedetomidine group was smaller in chills (p = 0.002), nausea (p = 0.000), vomiting (p = 0.04), and dysphoria (p = 0.024) than the non-dexmedetomidine group. Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine maintains a stable hemodynamic response and is beneficial to postoperative recovery in laparoscopic UF surgery. Clinical Trial Registration: The study has been registered on https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ (registration number: NCT03524950).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.