2013
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The value of the dual systems model of adolescent risk-taking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results, along with those of aforementioned studies, may be interpreted in light of dual-process models of addiction and risk-taking, which posit two interacting systems: an impulsive system related to drug-seeking that includes the amygdala and ventral striatum, and a reflective system (involving orbitofrontal regions, anterior cingulate, insula, somatosensory cortex, and hippocampus) that shapes future behavior based on affective states arising from consequences of prior behavior (Bechara, 2005; Steinberg, 2010; Strang et al, 2013). Among individuals who have tried cannabis, a dysfunctional reflective system would contribute to escalating drug use despite experiencing negative consequences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Our results, along with those of aforementioned studies, may be interpreted in light of dual-process models of addiction and risk-taking, which posit two interacting systems: an impulsive system related to drug-seeking that includes the amygdala and ventral striatum, and a reflective system (involving orbitofrontal regions, anterior cingulate, insula, somatosensory cortex, and hippocampus) that shapes future behavior based on affective states arising from consequences of prior behavior (Bechara, 2005; Steinberg, 2010; Strang et al, 2013). Among individuals who have tried cannabis, a dysfunctional reflective system would contribute to escalating drug use despite experiencing negative consequences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The present study provides evidence that the dual systems framework does predict individual differences in problematic substance use among college-enrolled adults (Strang, Chein, & Steinberg, 2013). The present study has a number of strengths, including the application of advanced quantitative methods to appropriately specify models for low base-rate risk behavior and the application of psychometrically validated measures of trait impulsivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This pattern of differential neurological development has been referred to as the dual systems model or the maturational imbalance theory [e.g., 36, 43••]; however, there are competing views of this model (see [43••, 44, 45] for a discussion of these issues and related controversies). The resulting developmentally normative mismatch between increased emotional volatility combined with an underdeveloped regulation system means that for youths particularly at risk (e.g., children of substance-dependent parents [46], those with environmental or genetic risk [29••], or psychosocial stress [38]), difficulty with emotion regulation is an identifiable, transdiagnostic, early embedded risk for psychopathology in adolescence—including disorders of addiction, as well as internalizing and externalizing problems [3••, 11••, 15, 17, 19, 4749, 50•, 51••, 52, 53••, 5456].…”
Section: Emotion Regulation Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%