2010
DOI: 10.1080/15472450.2010.484746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Value of Travel Information: A Search-Theoretic Approach

Abstract: This article presents a formulation of information acquisition that uses search theory to evaluate the value of information. The value of information is the added utility from being able to choose from the available travel alternatives after having received the information. There are three main advantages to the formulation: first, it results in a parsimonious model of information acquisition and travel choice. Second, it enables the use of observed information acquisition behavior for the estimation of travel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cognitive process leading to such behavior is however not described in these studies. Some similarities exist with the work of Chorus et al (2010) (extended in Chorus et al, In review) who model the value of information in terms of the difference between current utility and the anticipated utility after the information acquisition. They use data collected in a simulator and include a monetary cost of information whereas we are interested in the cognitive cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cognitive process leading to such behavior is however not described in these studies. Some similarities exist with the work of Chorus et al (2010) (extended in Chorus et al, In review) who model the value of information in terms of the difference between current utility and the anticipated utility after the information acquisition. They use data collected in a simulator and include a monetary cost of information whereas we are interested in the cognitive cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The magnitude of the cognitive cost is postulated based on the empirical evidence from an SP survey reported in Chorus et al (2010), where the non-monetary cost of information search is approximately one magnitude larger than the travel time (in minutes) coefficient. The magnitude of the benefit coefficient is close to the cognitive cost so that neither the cognitive cost nor the search benefit will dominate the choice and thus avoids obscuring the trade-off between the two factors.…”
Section: Data Generation and Model Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the importance of these aspects follows from the notion that travelers dislike uncertainty per se (i.e., are risk averse). The existence of this dislike of uncertainty has been well documented in the context of travel time uncertainty (e.g., Lam and Small, 2001;Bates et al, 2001;Rietveld et al, 2001;Brownstone and Small, 2005) as well as the travel costs uncertainty and uncertainty about waiting times (e.g., Chorus et al, 2010).…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several papers focus on the impact on travelers of the absence or of imperfect information. Examples of such studies are de Palma and Picard (2006), Emmerink et al (1996), Chorus et al (2007); see also the review of Rietveld (2011). Those papers generally examine the relationship between information availability and transport systems' efficiency; some of them conclude that providing more information is not necessarily welfare improving.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%