1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00953-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Value of Ultrasound With Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy Compared to Computed Tomography in the Detection of Regional Metastases in the Clinically Negative Neck

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
65
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, US performed by an experienced ultrasonographer is considered, by most clinicians and by the American Thyroid Association, as the screening and surveillance imaging modality of choice for detecting LLNM 27. Although USgFNAC was showed to be the most specific and accurate imaging modality to detect cervical LNM 25, most studies report that USgFNAC has a relatively lower sensitivity than US, and the false‐negative rate of USgFNAC could be as high as 45–52% 28, 29. In addition, given the closer relationship of the node to the surrounding vascular structures and the body habitus of the patient (such as some small nodes, which are not easily punctured by fine needle), routine preoperative USgFNAC is not done to guide LND at our institution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, US performed by an experienced ultrasonographer is considered, by most clinicians and by the American Thyroid Association, as the screening and surveillance imaging modality of choice for detecting LLNM 27. Although USgFNAC was showed to be the most specific and accurate imaging modality to detect cervical LNM 25, most studies report that USgFNAC has a relatively lower sensitivity than US, and the false‐negative rate of USgFNAC could be as high as 45–52% 28, 29. In addition, given the closer relationship of the node to the surrounding vascular structures and the body habitus of the patient (such as some small nodes, which are not easily punctured by fine needle), routine preoperative USgFNAC is not done to guide LND at our institution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical findings can be supplemented by imaging techniques, but they too have fallen short of expectations. Ultrasound is an easily available; affordable but highly operator dependent tool [17] that has been advocated by some authors for guided FNAC to augment accuracy [18]. CT and MR mainly rely on the size of the node along with other criteria like necrosis to assess the nodal involvement but size in itself is not pathognomonic for involvement, with a high error rate if used as the sole criteria to establish involvement [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in imaging techniques such as CT, MR imaging, and sonography have improved the accuracy of detection of cervical lymph node metastases, but patients with N0 classification may still harbor occult metastases. The incidence of occult metastases varies from 20% to 50%, 1,2,[6][7][8][9][10] and the management of the clinically negative (N0) neck remains a controversial issue. Several studies have suggested that histologic tumor thickness is related to cervical metastases of oral tongue cancer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%