Patients with BC might have concurrent UTUC, reported in approximately 2-5% of BC patients; 1,2 therefore, examination of the upper tract should be considered in BC patients. However, in BC patients with normal upper tract appearance on radiography and suspicious or positive urine cytology before TUR, which might suggest the potential presence of concomitant upper urinary carcinoma in situ in addition to BC, the necessity of retrograde upper tract cytology examination at the same time as TUR remains unclear in almost all guidelines in the USA and Europe, as well as Japan.3,4 Intraoperative upper tract urine cytology examination might increase the cost, lengthen the operating period and cause urinary tract infection. To our knowledge, only one study has reported the value of upper tract urine cytology examination at the same time as TUR; that study concluded that sampling of urine from the upper tract was not accurate because of contamination.
5However, the number of patients was very small; in addition, the patients were diagnosed as having "no malignancy" because of normal upper tract appearance on radiography. The study reported only the results of upper tract urine cytology, and not the final diagnosis of the patients with positive upper tract urine cytology. In the present study, we retrospectively examined the rate of concurrent UTUC in BC patients with normal upper tract appearance on radiography and preoperative suspicious or positive voided urine cytology.From January 2012 through December 2014, 132 BC patients underwent simultaneous TUR for BC and retrograde upper tract urine cytology examination. A total of 12 patients were excluded from the present study, because the upper tract appearance was abnormal on radiography. Therefore, 120 patients with normal upper tract appearance on radiography and preoperative suspicious or positive voided urine cytology were examined. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography, computed tomography urography, intravenous pyeloureterography or retrograde pyeloureterography was carried out for the radiographic examination. The urine cytology was evaluated by two specialists according to our strict institution criteria. Positive cytology (class IV, V) is defined as clusters of malignant cells or pathognomic cells, and suspicious (class III) cytology is defined as cells with abnormal features, but not sufficiently pathognomonic. In patients with suspicious or positive upper tract urine cytology, we carried out ureteroscopy, repeat retrograde upper tract cytology examination or careful follow up with voided urine cytology examination, as well as computed tomography urography examination, for confirmation. Table S1 shows the patients' characteristics. The median age was 73.5 years (range 38-88 years), and 104 of the 120 patients (86.7%) were men. The median follow-up time was 13 months (range 1-35 months). A total of 69 patients (57.5%) had normal urine cytology postoperatively. Figure 1 shows the clinical course of the patients. A total of 75 patients (62.5%) had positive voided u...