1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf03010934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Vancouver sedative recovery scale for children: validation and reliability of scoring based on videotaped instruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several observational scoring systems for assessing sedation depth have been developed and tested in a variety of clinical settings (8,10,(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21). The UMSS was designed as a simple tool to assess sedation depth over the entire continuum from awake to unarousable as defined by the AAP and the ASA and endorsed by the JCAHO (3,4,6,7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several observational scoring systems for assessing sedation depth have been developed and tested in a variety of clinical settings (8,10,(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21). The UMSS was designed as a simple tool to assess sedation depth over the entire continuum from awake to unarousable as defined by the AAP and the ASA and endorsed by the JCAHO (3,4,6,7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 The entire duration of sedation, from placement of the BIS monitor to sedation recovery, was recorded via video monitoring for 10 of the patients enrolled. The videos were subsequently reviewed by 2 of the investigators (M.M.…”
Section: Study Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Balanced incomplete block design was used to assess inter-rater reliability of Vancouver Sedative Recovery Scale by 16 raters using 16 children. 4 This design has an efficiency index of 0.89 relative to a completely crossed design (in which each of 16 raters would rate each of 16 children). 4 Balanced incomplete block design is indicated for comparing the raters' mean levels of rating and whether each mean is estimated with the same precision.…”
Section: ____________________________________________________________mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 This design has an efficiency index of 0.89 relative to a completely crossed design (in which each of 16 raters would rate each of 16 children). 4 Balanced incomplete block design is indicated for comparing the raters' mean levels of rating and whether each mean is estimated with the same precision. 2 The advantage of this method is not having the need to rate all the subjects by every rater.…”
Section: ____________________________________________________________mentioning
confidence: 99%