The variation and visualisation of elastic anisotropy in rock forming minerals

Abstract

Abstract. All minerals behave elastically, a rheological property that controls their ability to support stress, strain and pressure, the nature of acoustic wave propagation and influences subsequent plastic (i.e. permanent, non-reversible) deformation. All minerals are intrinsically anisotropic in their elastic properties – that is, they have directional variations that are related to the configuration of the crystal lattice. This means that the commonly used mechanical elastic properties that relate elastic stress to elastic strain, including Young's modulus (E), Poisson's ratio (ν), shear modulus (G) and linear compressibility (β), are dependent on crystallographic direction. In this paper, we explore the ranges of anisotropy of E, ν, G and β in 86 rock-forming minerals, using previously published data, and show that the range is much wider than commonly assumed. We also explore how these variations (the directionality and the magnitude) are important for fundamental processes in the solid earth, including deformation (mechanical) twinning, coherent phase transformations and brittle failure. We present a new open source software package (AnisoVis, written in MATLAB), which we use to calculate and visualise directional variations in elastic properties of rock-forming minerals. Following previous work in the fields of chemistry and materials, we demonstrate that by visualising the variations in elasticity, we discover previously unreported properties of rock forming minerals. For example, we show previously unreported directions of negative Poisson's ratio and negative linear compressibility and we show that the existence of these features is more widespread (i.e. present in many more minerals) than previously thought. We illustrate the consequences of intrinsic elastic anisotropy for the elastic normal and shear strains within α-quartz single crystal under different applied stress fields; the role of elastic anisotropy on Dauphiné twinning and the α-β phase transformations in quartz; and stress distributions around voids of different shapes in talc, lizardite, albite, and sanidine. In addition to our specific examples, elastic anisotropy in rock-forming minerals to the degree that we describe has significant consequences for seismic (acoustic) anisotropy, the focal mechanisms of earthquakes in anisotropic source regions (e.g. subducting slabs), for a range of brittle and ductile deformation mechanisms in minerals, and geobarometry using mineral inclusions.

Exploration of glassy state in Prussian blue analogues

“…Subsequently, the Hessian matrix was analysed using a numerical approximation method with two distortions done on each degree of freedom (including the unit cell). Spatial moduli were illustrated by either AnisoVis (https:// github.com/DaveHealy-Aberdeen/AnisoVis) 59 or the elastic tensor analysis ELATE (http://progs.coudert.name/elate) 58 . The elastic instability was evaluated through the Born stability criteria 46,54 .…”

“…5A, Supplementary Figs. 36-43, and Supplementary Table 7) 58,59 . exhibits a relatively high G min (18.8 GPa) and low G anisotropy of 4.2, which results in a moderate average G of 37.6 (−11.5%).…”

From hot to cold - The temperature dependence on rock deformation processes: An introduction

“…An important aspect relevant in structural geology is that most rock-forming minerals present low crystalline symmetry and therefore they normally behave anisotropically in terms of mechanics and recrystallisation (Healy et al, 2019). For example, the orientations of slip systems able to accommodate deformation and their CRSSs are controlled by crystal symmetry and lattice dimension.…”