This paper presents a summary of the computational predictions and measurement data contributed to Category 7 of the 3 rd AIAA Workshop on Benchmark Problems for Airframe Noise Computations (BANC-III), which was held in Atlanta, GA, on June 14-15, 2014. Category 7 represents the first slat-noise configuration to be investigated under the BANC series of workshops, namely, the 30P30N two-dimensional high-lift model (with a slat contour that was slightly modified to enable unsteady pressure measurements) at an angle of attack that is relevant to approach conditions. Originally developed for a CFD challenge workshop to assess computational fluid dynamics techniques for steady high-lift predictions, the 30P30N configurations has provided a valuable opportunity for the airframe noise community to collectively assess and advance the computational and experimental techniques for slat noise. The contributed solutions are compared with each other as well as with the initial measurements that became available just prior to the BANC-III Workshop. Specific features of a number of computational solutions on the finer grids compare reasonably well with the initial measurements from FSU and JAXA facilities and/or with each other. However, no single solution (or a subset of solutions) could be identified as clearly superior to the remaining solutions. Grid sensitivity studies presented by multiple BANC-III participants demonstrated a relatively consistent trend of reduced surface pressure fluctuations, higher levels of turbulent kinetic energy in the flow, and lower levels of both narrow band peaks and the broadband component of unsteady pressure spectra in the nearfield and farfield. The lessons learned from the BANC-III contributions have been used to identify improvements to the problem statement for future Category-7 investigations. Nomenclature a = speed of sound b sim = spanwise extent of simulation domain b = model span c = chord length of stowed configuration = 0.4572 m (18 inches) c s = slat chord C d = computed overall drag coefficient (scaled by planform area c⋅b sim ) C L = computed overall lift coefficient (scaled by planform area c⋅b sim ) C L, RMS= computed RMS lift coefficient (scaled by planform area c⋅b sim ) C L,s = contribution to overall lift coefficient (scaled by planform area c⋅b sim ) from slat C L,m = contribution to overall lift coefficient (scaled by planform area c⋅b sim ) from main wing C L,f = contribution to overall lift coefficient (scaled by planform area c⋅b sim ) from flap 1 Aerospace Technologist, Computational AeroSciences Branch, M.S. 128. Associate Fellow, AIAA. 2 Aerospace Technologist, Computational AeroSciences Branch, M.S. 128. Senior Member, AIAA. 3 Team members are listed in Table 1. Downloaded by PURDUE UNIVERSITY on July 26, 2015 | http://arc.aiaa.org | 2 Cp = surface pressure coefficient = (p-p ∞ )/(ρ ∞ U ∞ 2)/2 d impingement = distance between shear layer impingement location and slat trailing edge, normalized by c K = coverage factor for confidence interval L xy = minimum distanc...