The Cambridge Companion to Critical Theory 2004
DOI: 10.1017/ccol0521816602.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The very idea of a critical social science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others have suggested that pragmatism does not acknowledge the impact of embedded structural power on a community's ability to solve problems (Mills, 1969;White, 2004). Here, too, we see a different variation of the accusation that a pragmatic conception of democracy is based on unfounded faith.…”
Section: Criticisms Of Deweymentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Others have suggested that pragmatism does not acknowledge the impact of embedded structural power on a community's ability to solve problems (Mills, 1969;White, 2004). Here, too, we see a different variation of the accusation that a pragmatic conception of democracy is based on unfounded faith.…”
Section: Criticisms Of Deweymentioning
confidence: 82%
“…But even when experiencing nature and the outdoors as romanticized, people can acknowledge that process and its effects on their perception and behavior-both positively and negatively. Much more than a loose equation with "critical thinking, " it is best described by White's (2004) two-commitment minimum. Kadlec (2007) recounted, "Any genuinely critical theory or research tradition will .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of the new POE tool was approached by using a critical pragmatist epistemology and in-depth ontology (Froeyman, 2012). This led to the pursuit of pragmatic methods, but also critical thinking about the relationship between the method and the outcome (White, 2004;Joas, 1996). Depth ontology was used to seek out the hidden conditions that influence the learning environment operators' day-to-day experience of IEQ (Greener, 2011;Merker, 2010).…”
Section: Methodology and Methods -Role Of The Researcher And Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%