2016
DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2015.09.0187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Veterans Health Administration’s traumatic brain injury clinical reminder screen and evaluation: Practice patterns

Abstract: Abstract-The goals of this study were to describe clinical practice patterns associated with the Veterans Health Administration's (VHA's) Comprehensive Traumatic Brain Injury Evaluation (CTBIE) and determine whether practice patterns vary by patient, provider, or facility characteristics. Veterans (N = 614) who had initial healthcare visits between 2008 and 2011 and who had previously completed the VHA's traumatic brain injury (TBI) screen and subsequent CTBIE were drawn from a national database. Participants … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings may be a result of differential utilization, as previous research suggests that Hispanic veterans were less likely to utilize TBI services, including specialty clinics, neurology, and rehabilitation services in the VA health care system. 12 , 14 Low service utilization could lead to condition exacerbation or failure to identify preventable medical conditions early and before becoming chronic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings may be a result of differential utilization, as previous research suggests that Hispanic veterans were less likely to utilize TBI services, including specialty clinics, neurology, and rehabilitation services in the VA health care system. 12 , 14 Low service utilization could lead to condition exacerbation or failure to identify preventable medical conditions early and before becoming chronic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent studies have confirmed these findings, with alphas ranging from .91 to .94 (Menatti et al, 2020; Silva et al, 2013; Soble et al, 2014; Vos et al, 2019). The test–retest reliability of the NSI is also excellent, showing a strong correlation after both a 7-day ( r = .94) and 30-day ( r = .78) period (Belanger et al, 2016; Silva et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Previous studies have evaluated the NSI with respect to its reliability, validity, and other psychometric properties (Belanger et al, 2016; King et al, 2012; Menatti et al, 2020; Silva et al, 2013; Soble et al, 2014; Vos et al, 2019). This research has generally shown that the NSI has excellent internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and concurrent and construct validity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to data collection, the VATBIST, which was used to identify subjects that were referred to the TBI clinic, was found to provide good data sensitivity by Donnelly et al, 34 by Vanderploeg et al, 35 and by Belanger et al 36 However, in a subsequent report, the latter group noted poor test-retest reliability and validity compared to a semistructured interview developed at their institution. 53,54 The CTBIE used for evaluation in the TBI clinic was found to provide reliable data, 35,36 however, the depth of the data is not adequate to answer some highly specific questions. This is a cross-sectional study of previously collected data with one data point per participant and not a true longitudinal study with multiple data points spaced over time.…”
Section: Prior Tbimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the TBI clinic, the veteran was seen by a physician or physician's assistant with special training in TBI. A second questionnaire, the Comprehensive TBI Evaluation (CTBIE) 35,36 form was administered by the medical professional. This form queried detailed information about the possible DTBI, including whether the mode of injury was related to:…”
Section: Definition Of Tbimentioning
confidence: 99%