Sexuality, we are now told, plausibly enough, is everywhere.' Yet recent scholarship, for all its advances, has done little to register or interpret this ubiquity. The history of sexuality in the nineteenth century as the crucial era in the making of its modern sensibility has concentrated on certain areas: the submerged histories of 'deviant' groups; the ideology of written texts; controversies over regulation; and individual cases of that remarkable phenomenon, closet heterosexuality.2 These emphases on the wilder and more esoteric reaches of sexuality reinforce the construct of separate terrains by focussing on the (unacceptable) public face and the (secretive) private face in civil society. What is missing is an illumination of the 'middle' ground of sexuality, not as another exclusive territory, but as an extensive ensemble of sites, practises and occasions that mediate across the frontiers of the putative publidprivate divide.' Arguably it is here -in such everyday settings as the pub, the expanding apparatus of the service industries, and a commercialised popular culture -that capitalism and its patriarchal managers construct a new form of open yet licit sexuality that I propose to term parasexuality, a form whose visual code is known to us as the familiar but largely unexamined phenomenon of glamour.Parasexuality? The prefix combines two otherwise discrete meanings: first, in the sense of 'almost' or 'beside', denoting a secondary, or modified form of sexuality (cf. paramedic); second, the counter sense of being 'against', denoting a form of protection from, or prevention of sexuality (6. parachute).However here the function argued is conceived somewhat differently, as an inoculation in which a little sexuality is encouraged as an antidote to its subversive properties. Parasexuality then is sexuality that is deployed but contained, carefully channelled rather than fully discharged; in vulgar terms it might be represented as 'everything but. ' Everything but what? What is the prime form of sexuality for which parasexuality is taken to offer a modification or antidote? The language of discharge bespeaks a fundamentally male or phallocentric concept of sexuality -the hydraulic model -in which sex is a limited but powaful energy system,