2011
DOI: 10.1080/13507486.2011.590184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The view from the border: a comparative study of autonomism in Alsace and the Moselle, 1918–29

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in line with prior evidence showing that policies threatening the cultural identity of a group or perceived as discriminatory can lead to a "backlash" (Fouka, 2016). In the case of Alsace-Lorraine (AL), historians describe a strong feeling of regional identity, which is seen as a plausible reaction to the intrusive homogenization policies enforced by the German and later the French government between 1870 and the 1950s (Carrol and Zanoun, 2011;Höpel, 2012;Rothenberger, 1975). Although historical evidences emphasizes the role of homogenization policies, other features of the shock (like the alteration in nation-status and occupation) could also contribute to its effect on identity.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in line with prior evidence showing that policies threatening the cultural identity of a group or perceived as discriminatory can lead to a "backlash" (Fouka, 2016). In the case of Alsace-Lorraine (AL), historians describe a strong feeling of regional identity, which is seen as a plausible reaction to the intrusive homogenization policies enforced by the German and later the French government between 1870 and the 1950s (Carrol and Zanoun, 2011;Höpel, 2012;Rothenberger, 1975). Although historical evidences emphasizes the role of homogenization policies, other features of the shock (like the alteration in nation-status and occupation) could also contribute to its effect on identity.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Important pillars of these policies were also, among others, the denial of full democratic representation (Carrol, 2010), the continued use of an intrusive "dictatorship paragraph" by the Germans (Carrol, 2010), and the imposition of a Frenchness Commission after WWI , as well as restrictions on the use of local dialects (Callender, 1927) by the French government after WWI. More details are provided in, e.g., Carrol and Zanoun (2011); Höpel (2012); Rothenberger (1975) and Vajta (2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And although parts of the bourgeoisie were Francophile, the overwhelming majority of Alsatians and Lorrainers did not harbour dormant French sentiments. On the eve of the war, most people's collective identities were ‘fluid,’ multilayered and in many cases detached from politics (Carrol & Zanoun, 2011, p.466; Thaler, 2001). The strongest domestic political movement in Alsace‐Lorraine before the war called for greater regional autonomy within a reformed German state (Fischer, 2010, pp.21, 47).…”
Section: Alsace‐lorraine and Strategic Nationalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower classification leads to e.g., travel bans (Harvey 1999). Regional institutions and administrative personnel 1924: Ministerial declaration by Premier Edouard Herriot imposes a centralized administration, French laws, and institutions (Carrol and Zanoun 2011).…”
Section: Eu Support-eurosceptic Partiesmentioning
confidence: 99%