2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The view from the road: The contribution of on-road glance-monitoring technologies to understanding driver behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[21][22][23] Land et al 24 asked subjects to perform a simple everyday task (making a cup of tea) and found that very few fixations were irrelevant to this task. Rothkopf et al 20 also found that gaze direction was determined by current task requirements during a simulated walking study in which subjects were given different task instructions, e.g.…”
Section: Eye Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23] Land et al 24 asked subjects to perform a simple everyday task (making a cup of tea) and found that very few fixations were irrelevant to this task. Rothkopf et al 20 also found that gaze direction was determined by current task requirements during a simulated walking study in which subjects were given different task instructions, e.g.…”
Section: Eye Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach to identifying critical visual tasks is to find out what pedestrians look at, and eye-tracking offers one method for establishing the objects fixated. There is reason to have some confidence that distribution of gaze and cognitive processes are related [4][5][6] to the extent that a study investigating pedestrians' fixations in a virtual environment found that specific tasks could be predicted from fixation data. 7 Two studies used eye-tracking to record fixations on other pedestrians in laboratory trials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study aims to investigate how drivers' hazard anticipation is affected by executing a number of everyday tasks when driving a real vehicle within a real environment. It is indeed possible that findings obtained in simulated studies, as in the case of Taylor et al (2013), might not be fully replicated when participants are at the wheel of a real car (Haigney & Westerman, 2010). In addition, as hazard locations we considered road intersections that, unlike locations designed by Taylor and colleagues (2013), are highly familiar to drivers.…”
Section: Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When these two tasks were executed concurrently, compared to when participants were driving only, they were observed to produce slower braking responses. In a driving simulator study by Taylor et al (2013), authors were interested in observing how cognitive distraction affected drivers' anticipatory glances when approaching locations where hazards could potentially appear. In the not-distracted condition participants were driving only, whereas when distracted they were instructed to carry on a conversation on a hands-free cell phone.…”
Section: Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%