2017
DOI: 10.1080/09548963.2017.1274360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The village in the city: participation and cultural value on the urban periphery

Abstract: Drawing on evidence from ethnographic fieldwork conducted in 2014-2016 for the Understanding Everyday Participation (UEP) project, this paper addresses the relationship between space, place and participation in a "suburban village" on the edge of the city of Aberdeen in North East Scotland. Recent critiques have pointed to the ways in which the rural and peri-urban domains have been neglected in cultural policy as the byproduct of a preoccupation with urban regeneration and the "creative city". Working with co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing research that seeks to challenge the 'problem' of cultural participation tends to critique how the problem has been framed, rather than questioning its ontological status, considering why it exists, and reflecting on what its existence does to social relations. For example, a significant body of recent work has sought to highlight the prevalence of 'everyday participation' (Miles and Ebrey, 2017;Miles and Gibson, 2017;Taylor, 2016;Belfiore et al, 2011) making the argument that "there is no problem if we adopt a notion of cultural participation that extends beyond the arts into spheres of everyday creativity and participation" (Belfiore, 2016, p.209). Such research has lead to a resurgent call for policies that would redistribute resource so as to better support the creation of a 'cultural democracy' (Jeffers and Moriarty, 2018;Gross and Wilson, 2018;Evrard, 1997).…”
Section: Background To the Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing research that seeks to challenge the 'problem' of cultural participation tends to critique how the problem has been framed, rather than questioning its ontological status, considering why it exists, and reflecting on what its existence does to social relations. For example, a significant body of recent work has sought to highlight the prevalence of 'everyday participation' (Miles and Ebrey, 2017;Miles and Gibson, 2017;Taylor, 2016;Belfiore et al, 2011) making the argument that "there is no problem if we adopt a notion of cultural participation that extends beyond the arts into spheres of everyday creativity and participation" (Belfiore, 2016, p.209). Such research has lead to a resurgent call for policies that would redistribute resource so as to better support the creation of a 'cultural democracy' (Jeffers and Moriarty, 2018;Gross and Wilson, 2018;Evrard, 1997).…”
Section: Background To the Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst cultural capital and cultural value are usually associated with civilizational-level knowledge or artefacts, this paper will demonstrate how these factors are generated at a local level through community activities and shared understandings that are "bottom up" and even oppositional to mainstream hegemonic culture. The contribution of this paper is to understand how cultural value is generated through community social relationships and day-to-day participation (Miles andEbrey2017, Skeggs 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the United States, and especially since the 2016 elections, there are three distinct, yet interrelated mechanisms to defend the gains made in the areas of human and social rights with a focus on maintaining diversity, equality and inclusion: (1) burgeoning civil society and resistance; (2) strengthening of ethics and compliance principles within organization; and (3) a reconstruction of the welfare state in order to counter the neoliberal agenda. Whereas the forces of privatization and marketization have led to disenfranchized communities (Cucchiara et al, ), a deepening of social fissures between the core and the periphery (arguing with Miles and Ebrey, ), and very evident in the presidential elections of 2016 in regards to Red and Blue states, with delineation along the lines of rural areas and urban centres, and an increase in overall household debts and consumerism (CNBC, ), civil society and civil rights movements have gained momentum in order to reclaim the role as mediators between the communities and the government. These movements have been very vocal, focusing on a diversity narrative that has largely been absent from the public discourse for some time (Bloemrad and Writght, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%