2017
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201630112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS)

Abstract: We use the final data from the VIPERS redshift survey to extract an unparalleled sample of more than 2000 massive M ≥1011 M ⊙ passive galaxies (MPGs) at redshift 0.5 ≤ z ≤ 1.0, based on their NUVrK colours. This enables us to investigate how the population of these objects was built up over cosmic time. We find that the evolution of the number density depends on the galaxy mean surface stellar mass density, Σ. In particular, dense (Σ ≥ 2000 M ⊙ pc −2 ) MPGs show a constant comoving number density over this red… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
46
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
9
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When considering the mass thresholds adopted by Cassata et al (2013), our model Q number density is in agreement with the corresponding observational estimates. When considering the mass thresholds adopted by van Dokkum et al (2015) and Gargiulo et al (2017), model predictions are offset low with respect to observational estimates, at all cosmic epochs. If we consider the uncertainty in the stellar mass measurement, adding Gaussian random error to log 10 (M * ) with a standard deviation of σ * = 0.25 dex, the resulting number density evolution changes significantly, in particular at high redshift, as shown in the bottom panel of figure 4.…”
Section: Evolution Of Size and Number Density Of Q Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…When considering the mass thresholds adopted by Cassata et al (2013), our model Q number density is in agreement with the corresponding observational estimates. When considering the mass thresholds adopted by van Dokkum et al (2015) and Gargiulo et al (2017), model predictions are offset low with respect to observational estimates, at all cosmic epochs. If we consider the uncertainty in the stellar mass measurement, adding Gaussian random error to log 10 (M * ) with a standard deviation of σ * = 0.25 dex, the resulting number density evolution changes significantly, in particular at high redshift, as shown in the bottom panel of figure 4.…”
Section: Evolution Of Size and Number Density Of Q Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…To have a fair comparison with observations, we select Q galaxies adopting different stellar mass thresholds. Solid, dotted and dash-dotted lines show predictions corresponding to M * > 10 10 M (as in Cassata et al 2013), M * > 10 10.6 M (as in van Dokkum et al 2015), and M * > 10 11 M (as in Gargiulo et al 2017). van Dokkum et al (2015) selected galaxies from the 3D-HST project (Brammer et al 2012), according to their position in the U − V versus V − J diagram (the considered size is the circularized half-light radius re).…”
Section: Evolution Of Size and Number Density Of Q Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this context, the intermediate redshift range (0.3 z 0.7) offers an interesting niche of investigation: the span in cosmic time covered up to z ∼ 0.7 is nearly half the age of the Universe, enabling the direct observation of galaxies over a significant and continuous interval of their evolutionary life. In this redshift range, a coarse estimate of the morphological type is possible with data from ground-based telescopes ; the fraction of galaxies located in structures like groups progressively rises as expected in a hierarchical structure formation scenario (Knobel et al 2009), and the increase of number of red massive passive galaxies is significant down to z ∼ 0.5 (Gargiulo et al 2017;Haines et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%